Why "Green Zone" flopped: 5 Theories

Critics are debating what's behind the spectacular failure of Matt Damon's $130 million Iraq-war film

Why did Damon's 'Green Zone' flop?
(Image credit: Universal Pictures)

On paper, Green Zone sounded like an inevitable hit: A big budget war movie starring Matt Damon and directed by "Bourne" trilogy director Paul Greengrass. In reality, however, the $130 million drama flopped badly, taking in just $14.5 million in its first three days. Five theories why "Green Zone" fared so badly at the box office:

1. Green Zone is about Iraq

No doubt rival Hollywood executives are "breathing a sigh of relief" that they have no Iraq war movies in the works, says Ben Fritz at the LA Times. A string of similarly themed films (The Kingdom, Body of Lies, and Stop-Loss) has consistently bombed; despite its Oscars, The Hurt Locker has earned relatively little. Even Green Zone's Damon/Greengrass "pedigree" couldn't reverse the trend.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

2. Anything about Iraq is, by definition, "dated"

Making a movie about an "ongoing war" is dangerous enough; it's even risker when that war has "dominated headlines for several years," says Julian Sancton in Vanity Fair. As Obama enters his second year, this "indictment of the Bush administration" is about "as tired as Jay Leno's Clinton jokes."

3. The film's anti-military stance borders on slander

This is "one of the most egregiously anti-American movies ever released by a major studio," according to the Big Hollywood blog. It blames "U.S. treachery" almost exclusively for "the most violent years" of the war, discounting the role that insurgents played. Though it's a fictional film, these "vicious anti-American lies" have the ring of "slander."

4. Blame the marketing division for a "been-there, done-that" trailer

Universal gambled and lost by pushing Green Zone as an "action and intrigue" Bourne-series lookalike, says Ray Subers at Box Office Mojo. By contrast, Jarhead, says Anthony D'Alessandro at IndieWire, which scored "one of the better openings for Middle Eastern war pic," back in 2005 offered an "edgy Kanye West-scored trailer" that mixed "dark humor and action."

5. The movie's just not very good

The Hurt Locker succeeded critically where Green Zone failed, says Ross Douthat in The New York Times, because it acknowledges "shades of gray." Greengrass' depiction of Iraq is riddled with "cliches and simplifications." It's these, not the Iraq theme itself, that will damn the film to obscurity.

"Hollywood's Political Fictions"

To continue reading this article...
Continue reading this article and get limited website access each month.
Get unlimited website access, exclusive newsletters plus much more.
Cancel or pause at any time.
Already a subscriber to The Week?
Not sure which email you used for your subscription? Contact us