Feature

Investing: Can you really beat the market?

Prices are influenced by both an &ldquo;investment value&rdquo; and a &ldquo;speculative element.&rdquo;<em></em>

Given how erratically stocks have performed over the past couple of years, it’s “tempting” to think you could achieve more predictable returns by picking stocks yourself, said Jason Zweig in The Wall Street Journal. Consider the odd performance of Bank of America’s stock. Between October 2007 and March 2009, it fell 94 percent, then finished 2009 up 380 percent. So much for “efficient markets.” Truth is, the market very often does behave irrationally, but that doesn’t mean you can beat it, even if you know better. That’s because prices are influenced by both an “investment value” and a “speculative element.” But to really tell where a price is about to go, you would need to be able to predict “the changing emotions of tens of millions of people.”

“If sophisticated money managers using the most advanced techniques” can’t beat the market, odds are you can’t either, said Mark Hulbert in The New York Times. Sure, there are countless investment advisory newsletters that promise to help you get an edge by telling you when to trade in and out of stock funds. But over the long run these model portfolios “generally fail.” Only 11 out of 200 such portfolios made money during the recent bear market, and even then their average annual five-year return of 1 percent was “statistically indistinguishable” from the average actively managed U.S. stock fund. A word to the wise: “Performance during a bear market has little to do with long-term returns.”

All this seems to suggest that you’re better off parking your assets in index funds, said Pat Regnier in Money. Yet “twice in less than a decade,” investors who took that passive approach have been burned by “bursting asset bubbles,” and they ended up facing steep losses. Because index funds base their weightings on market capitalization, they often overexpose investors to the “bubbliest” stocks. One way around this “design flaw” is to hold fewer equities when prices seem high and to buy a “little extra” when they seem cheap. You might also take a look at the alternative indexes developed by money manager Rob Arnott; his weightings are based on company valuations, rather than on market cap. Had it “actually existed” back in 1999, Arnott’s FTSE RAFI 1000 Index would have outperformed the S&P 500 by five percentage points over the past 10 years.

Recommended

U.S. to crack down on guns going south, Mexico works to stop fentanyl heading north
A CBP agent at the U.S.-Mexico border in San Ysidro, California.
Stopping the Flow

U.S. to crack down on guns going south, Mexico works to stop fentanyl heading north

Lebanon to reverse daylight savings decision
Clock tower in Lebanon.
really, what time is it?

Lebanon to reverse daylight savings decision

The extreme weather events of 2023
An illustration of a tornado and wind-swept palm trees
In depth

The extreme weather events of 2023

Most of Silicon Valley Bank bought by First Citizens, FDIC says
An entrance to a Silicon Valley Bank
Fire Sale

Most of Silicon Valley Bank bought by First Citizens, FDIC says

Most Popular

How to watch 5 planets align in the night sky on Tuesday
Moon, Jupiter, Venus.
skyline

How to watch 5 planets align in the night sky on Tuesday

5 toons about Trump's possible indictment
Political Cartoon
Feature

5 toons about Trump's possible indictment

Florida principal forced to resign over Michelangelo's David display
The statue of &#039;David&#039; by Michelangelo.
Controversy Over David

Florida principal forced to resign over Michelangelo's David display