Citi’s largest shareholder: you
Is taking a 36 percent stake in Citigroup good for taxpayers?
Congratulations, U.S. taxpayers, said Karen Tumulty in Time online. “You are about to become the biggest shareholder in one of the country’s premier financial institutions,” Citigroup. The Treasury Department Friday took a 36 percent stake in the bank and will get a majority of board seats.
“Here’s the deal,” said Henry Blodget in Clusterstock. “You, the taxpayer, will be converting your dividend-paying Citigroup preferred stock into non-dividend paying Citigroup common stock.” And in a further “gift” to shareholders, you’re overpaying by about 30 percent for the common stock. Half of Citi's board gets fired, but that's “just a symbolic concession.”
The board takeover is actually a troubling development and a possible violation of shareholder rights, said Douglas McIntyre in 24/7 Wall Street. It’s also “insidious and clever” on the government’s part. If Treasury nationalized Citi, bondholders—including large insurance firms and pension funds—would take huge losses, triggering another round of bailouts.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Road trip: New England’s maple syrup season
Feature New England is serving up maple syrup in delicious and unexpected ways
By The Week US Published
-
Music Reviews: Mdou Moctar, Panda Bear, and Tate McRae
Feature “Tears of Injustice,” “Sinister Grift,” and “So Close to What”
By The Week US Published
-
What's at stake in the Mahmoud Khalil deportation fight?
Talking Points Vague accusations and First Amendment concerns
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published