Obama signs stimulus law
President Obama signed into law a $787 billion stimulus package designed to reverse the momentum of a deepening recession.
What happened
Declaring “the beginning of the end” of the nation’s economic crisis, President Obama this week signed into law a $787 billion stimulus package designed to reverse the momentum of a deepening recession. Obama signed the 1,100-page American Recovery and Reinvestment Act at a ceremony in Denver, saying it would save or create 3.5 million jobs over the next two years. The law is part of “the essential work of keeping the American dream alive in our time,” Obama said.
The stimulus law allocates $507 billion to projects such as road, bridge, and other infrastructure repair, alternative-energy projects, and transportation subsidies, and provides increased aid to the poor and unemployed through expanded health insurance and food stamp benefits. The remaining $280 billion takes the form of tax cuts, including a tax break of $800 for most working families. The law passed with the support of just three Republicans in the Senate and none in the House of Representatives.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What the editorials said
The process wasn’t pretty, said The Washington Post, but in the end, “Mr. Obama can claim a victory.” The package he signed is very close to the one he originally proposed. It has roughly the same proportion of spending to tax cuts and costs just $14 billion more. Though it still contains some irrelevant expenditures that are unlikely to help the economy, “the heart of the package is a collection of measures that do seem timely, targeted, and temporary.”
The stimulus would have been larger, and more effective, if not for Obama’s “futile pursuit of bipartisanship,” said The New York Times. In an attempt to win over Republicans who wanted to see him fail, Obama sacrificed spending on new school construction, billions in aid to struggling state governments, and other worthy projects. With the economy on pace to lose 5 million jobs, he’ll almost certainly need to come back to Congress and ask for more money in a year or two. Let’s hope he’s a little tougher when he does.
What the columnists said
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Obama’s victory was a product of despicable fear-mongering, said Jacob Sullum in the Chicago Sun-Times. Just as George Bush rammed through the Patriot Act after 9/11 by warning of imminent catastrophe if he didn’t get his way, Obama muttered darkly about the Great Depression and intoned, “We can’t afford to wait.” There was no time for Congress, much less the public, to even read the entire package before the final vote. And just as the Patriot Act turned out to be a Trojan horse for draconian tools that law-and-order conservatives had been seeking for years, the stimulus law “is a grab bag of expenditures that leftish Democrats have long wanted, repackaged for the crisis du jour.”
Obama won this legislative battle, but “at a high price—fiscally and politically,” said Karl Rove in The Wall Street Journal. “Obama, for all his talents, has already re-energized the GOP and sparked a spending debate that will last for years.” The big winners are the House Republicans, especially “young guns” such as Minority Whip Eric Cantor, who challenged the Democratic myth that pouring hundreds of billions into anti-poverty, welfare, and pork projects will revive the economy.
The Republicans remain as delusional as they were during last year’s campaign, said Frank Rich in The New York Times. They’re high-fiving in celebration of their imaginary “victory” over Obama, even though the president got a stimulus of the size he wanted, and on the schedule he set. If anything, Obama should be even more aggressive in pursuing his agenda on the economy, energy, and health care. “Far from depleting Obama’s clout, the stimulus battle reaffirmed that he has the political capital to pursue the agenda of change he campaigned on.”
What next?
Tens of billions of dollars in the stimulus package will be handed over to state governments to spend on local projects as they see fit—as long as they do it quickly. Figuring out what to do with this money “may sound like a nice problem for the states,” said Beth Fouhy in the Associated Press, but it will actually “set off huge internal battles” among governors, legislators, and countless interest groups. The big debate in Washington may be over, but 50 smaller ones are about to begin.
-
Will California's EV mandate survive Trump, SCOTUS challenge?
Today's Big Question The Golden State's climate goal faces big obstacles
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
'Underneath the noise, however, there’s an existential crisis'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
2024: the year of distrust in science
In the Spotlight Science and politics do not seem to mix
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
NSA surveillance ruled unconstitutional
feature A federal judge ruled that the National Security Agency's mass collection of domestic phone data “almost certainly” violates the Constitution.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
The gun debate one year after Newtown
feature The first anniversary of the school shootings in Newtown reignited the debate over gun control, as another school shooting occurred in Colorado.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
A gun revolt in Colorado
feature Two Colorado Democrats who helped push through tough new gun-control laws were ousted in a historic recall vote.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
The battle over voter ID laws
feature The Obama administration is challenging the right of Texas to enforce rigorous new voting restrictions.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Stricter affirmative action
feature The Supreme Court raised the bar for considering race in university admissions.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Voting Rights Act gutted
feature The Supreme Court struck down a core component of the 1965 Voting Rights Act.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
A turning point on gay marriage
feature The Supreme Court struck a historic blow in favor of gay rights.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Court approves DNA swabs
feature The Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4 decision that police are justified in taking DNA samples from anyone who’s arrested.
By The Week Staff Last updated