How did Bernard Madoff get away with it for so long? asked Binyamin Applebaum and David Hilzenrath in The Washington Post. In what investigators say may be the largest investment scam in history, the head of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities was charged last week with securities fraud after reportedly confessing to running a $50 billion “Ponzi scheme” that snared celebrities, wealthy retirees, and several charities. Investigators haven’t said when Madoff began “the fraudulent practice of using new investments to pay existing investors”—the definition of a classic Ponzi scheme. But he appears to have somehow escaped detection by perfecting the art of “misdirection.” While he was luring investors into his hedge fund with promises of low-risk, above-average returns, authorities said, “he simultaneously operated a legitimate, regulated, and high-profile business as one of the largest middlemen between buyers and sellers of stock.” Regulators focused on that so-called market-making business and paid little attention to Madoff’s money-management activities.
The Securities and Exchange Commission has some serious explaining to do, said Tom Lauricella in The Wall Street Journal. It’s now clear that for years the agency ignored evidence that something was terribly wrong with Madoff’s operation. Some market insiders have long maintained that Madoff’s purported investment strategy couldn’t possibly generate the steady returns he was delivering. Madoff claimed to earn high returns by buying stocks and simultaneously trading options on those stocks, profiting on tiny price differences between the two. (An option is the right, but not the obligation, to buy or sell a given stock at a specific price on a specific date.) But to do so, he would have had to trade far more options contracts than actually change hands daily on the nation’s options exchanges. Such discrepancies convinced Harry Markopolos, a rival money manager, that “the results likely weren’t real.” He wrote to the SEC back in 1999 warning that “Madoff Securities is the world’s largest Ponzi scheme.” The SEC has now launched an internal investigation to determine why it ignored such warnings.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
-
Issue of the week: Raising the minimum wagefeature How will raising the federal minimum wage from $7.25 to $9 an hour affect the economy?
-
Issue of the week: Breaking up the big banks
feature There’s a growing realization that we need to end the taxpayer guarantees that Dodd-Frank left in place.
-
Issue of the week: The death of daily deals?
feature This is a “winter of discontent” for daily deal companies Groupon and LivingSocial.
-
Issue of the week: CEOs tackle the deficit
feature America’s top business leaders sent Congress an open letter urging immediate action on the $16 trillion national debt.
-
Issue of the week: Does Wall Street need speed limits?
feature High-frequency trading now accounts for as much as 70 percent of market volume.
-
Issue of the week: Victory for a bank watchdog
feature A New York state financial regulator accused a London-based bank of laundering $250 billion for Iran.
-
Issue of the week: A former megabanker’s conversion
feature Sanford Weill, the architect of the modern megabank, now favors the end of too-big-to-fail banks.
-
Issue of the week: Libor scandal rocks banking
feature The interest rate scandal is just beginning and may soon engulf at least a dozen other major banks.