Issue of the week: Investment banks, RIP

Why did the "Masters of the Universe" fail and how will Wall Street change?

And then there were none. When investment banks Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley converted to federally chartered commercial banks this week, said Joseph Weber in BusinessWeek, Wall Street as we know it came to an end. Following the Washington-driven takeover of Bear Stearns by JPMorgan Chase, the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers, and Merrill Lynch’s flight “into the waiting arms of giant Bank of America,” Goldman and Morgan were the last two major independent investment banks left standing. Now they’ve junked their old business model, moving to replace the short-term loans that once funded their activities with long-term customer deposits. Their new structure is designed to reassure skittish investors, and it seems to have worked: A day after the announcement about Goldman’s and Morgan’s new status, Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway bought $5 billion of Goldman preferred shares. But the banks’ newfound stability comes at a high price. A demanding new regulator, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., will replace the hands-off Securities and Exchange Commission and force the banks to abandon their “swashbuckling, risk-taking, and financially ingenious” ways.

Wall Street’s self-styled “Masters of the Universe” may have brought this fate upon themselves, said David Leonhardt in The New York Times, but they had plenty of help from Washington. When dot-com stocks’ house of cards came crashing down in the late 1990s, Alan Greenspan’s Federal Reserve, in a bid to keep investors investing, slashed short-term interest rates to near zero—and kept them there. Further encouragement to borrow came from the SEC, which in 2003 allowed the investment banks to borrow up to 30 times their own capital, far more than their previous limit of 12 times capital. They sank that borrowed money into the housing boom, concocting exotic securities that “sliced mortgages into so many little pieces that they forgot what they were really trading: contracts based on increasingly shaky loans.” When home­owners stopped paying, the investment banks had no cash flow to repay their own debts.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up
To continue reading this article...
Continue reading this article and get limited website access each month.
Get unlimited website access, exclusive newsletters plus much more.
Cancel or pause at any time.
Already a subscriber to The Week?
Not sure which email you used for your subscription? Contact us