The hidden benefits of a winning team
Drake Bennett
The Boston Globe
Sports fans invest a lot in their favorite teams—figuratively and literally, said Drake Bennett. Not only do committed fans devote considerable “money, time, and lost sleep” to their teams, taxpayers often shell out millions for stadiums to keep the home team from bolting. Is it worth it? A new study suggests that from an economic standpoint, the answer is yes, though with a catch: “The team has to be good.” Economist Michael Davis and psychologist Christian End found that having a winning NFL team increases the incomes of hometown residents by up to $120 a year. By way of explanation, these scholars point to studies showing that happier people work harder and spend more, thus boosting the local economy. Strange as it may seem, many fans identify with their teams so deeply that when their team wins a big game or a championship, they actually take some credit for the victory. It wasn’t just the Red Sox who won—it was us. Feeling like world-beaters boosts the fans’ self-confidence, testosterone levels, and, as a result, their productivity. Sure, it’s all “an illusion,” but psychologists have long understood that “self-confidence doesn’t have to be earned to make a difference.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
California mulls pulling health care from eligible undocumented migrants
IN THE SPOTLIGHT After pushing for universal health care for all Californians regardless of their immigration status, Gov. Gavin Newsom's latest budget proposal backs away from a key campaign promise
-
Is Apple breaking up with Google?
Today's Big Question Google is the default search engine in the Safari browser. The emergence of artificial intelligence could change that.
-
Music reviews: Eric Church, Blondshell, and Model/Actriz
Feature "Evangeline vs. the Machine," "If You Asked for a Picture," and "Pirouette"
-
Viewpoint: Michael S. Teitelbaum and Jay M. Winter
feature From The New York Times: “Nearly half of all people now live in countries where women, on average, give birth to fewer than 2.1 babies...
-
Snowden’s silence on Putin
feature If Edward Snowden truly is a moral paragon, then he should announce that he can no longer stomach Vladimir Putin’s oppressive behavior.
-
The irrelevance of the United Nations
feature Once again, the United Nations has been “rendered impotent by a small group of thugs.”
-
Millions of closeted gay men
feature “What percent of American men are gay?”
-
The smug confidence of libertarians
feature Why are most libertarians white dudes?
-
Seeing racism for what it is
feature Riley Cooper’s case shows just how poorly he and most other Americans understand “what a racist is.”
-
Searching for a libertarian paradise
feature Not one of the world’s 193 sovereign states—not even a tiny one—has adopted a full-on libertarian system.
-
Viewpoint: Juliette Kayyem
feature From The Boston Globe: “It is now clear that the Tsarnaev brothers had no strategic plan but to kill in a very public fashion....