How they see us: Is Iraq signing its sovereignty away?
The dispute over when to withdraw troops isn't the only problem Iraqis have with the security agreement proposed by the United States. Why is the U.S. also insisting on supervising Iraqi export revenues, investments, and contracts?
Condoleezza Rice is destined to fail, said Iran’s Jomhuri-ye Eslami in an editorial. The U.S. secretary of state will never get the Iraqis to sign the security agreement with the U.S. that she has drafted. The Americans want the agreement to leave the date of their troops’ withdrawal open, while the Iraqis rightly insist on a firm deadline. Moreover, the Americans demand that their soldiers get immunity from prosecution for all the crimes they have committed against the Iraqi people. With those two provisions in place, “the word ‘security’ in that agreement obviously means safeguarding American security,” not Iraqi security.
Those aren’t the only stumbling blocks, said Salam Abbud in Iraq’s Ahewar.org. We have yet to see the full text of the draft agreement, but according to the many leaks—by both U.S. and Iraqi officials—there are plenty of reasons for Iraqis to oppose it. One clause requires Iraq to cooperate with U.S. allies in the war on terror, which sounds benign until you consider that “this is tantamount to cooperation with Israel.” Another clause apparently gives the U.S. ambassador the freedom to arrest anyone at will, “even the Iraqi prime minister.” Worst of all, the agreement stipulates that the U.S. supervise all Iraqi export revenues, investments, and contracts, meaning that the most lucrative deals will surely go to American companies.
Why are we even contemplating signing an agreement with an occupier? asked Kamal al-Kisi in Iraq’s Kitabat. Evidently some of our leaders “have come to view the occupier as sincere in his desire to establish a democratic Iraq.” They are sadly duped. The occupation is “the appropriation of a free nation, the destruction of a country, and the subjugation of its people.” To reach an accord with the occupier is to sell our souls. Iraqis must continue to fight. The only just end to the occupation is one that returns full sovereignty to Iraqis alone.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Unfortunately, we can’t trust the Iraqis to safeguard their sovereignty, said Ghassan Charbel in the Saudi-owned Al-Hayat. Iran has insinuated itself into the very fabric of the Iraqi domestic scene, with “a strong presence in Baghdad, Najaf, and Basra, as well as in the government and parliament.” Were the Americans to pull out of Iraq tomorrow, Iran would soon control the country—and by extension much of the Mideast. As distasteful as it may be, at least “a continued U.S. presence in Iraq will set a boundary on the Iranian influence.”
It’s true that for now we still need the Americans, said Hassan Al-Ashur in Iraq’s Al-Sabah. Iraqi forces simply are not ready to fill the vacuum that a U.S. pullout would create. Our soldiers are not yet certain where their first loyalty lies—to their religious sect, to their political party, or to the Iraqi nation. “Before demanding a U.S. withdrawal, we must cultivate true nationalism in our hearts—the kind that places the good of the country above all other considerations.”
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
Today's political cartoons - October 23, 2024
Cartoons Wednesday's cartoons - loving thy neighbour, an HR matter, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Giuliani must hand assets to women he defamed
Speed Read The former New York City mayor must turn over his apartment and other possessions
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Abercrombie ex-CEO charged with sex crimes
Speed Read Mike Jeffries ran the brand during its heyday from 1992 to 2014
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Saudis want action on Syria
feature The Syrian conflict “has tested the Saudi-U.S. pact as never before.”
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
NSA spy scandal divides Europe
feature Spy agencies are supposed to protect their nations’ interests, but with this scandal the NSA has only harmed them.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Any takers for a war on Syria?
feature Despite David Cameron’s pleas, the British Parliament says no to Syria, while François Hollande, in a surprise move, provides French backing.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Turkey wants our help with Syria
feature Turkey can’t take any more—it’s time to tell our closest ally, the U.S., that “it is past time to do something.”
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Afghans worry about U.S. pullout
feature Is an internal meltdown all but inevitable after the U.S. withdraws its troops?
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
The world’s biggest free-trade zone
feature An “economic NATO” has been proposed before, but President Obama is the first leader to give it such an unequivocal endorsement.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Should Canada keep U.S. deserters?
feature Last week, Canada for the first time deported a female Iraq War resister.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
How they see us: Calling the Haqqanis terrorists
feature After two years of “spirited debate,” the U.S. has declared the Haqqani network a terrorist group.
By The Week Staff Last updated