Defining Olympic success

The Beijing Games were dazzling, but were they worth the steep price?

China got precisely what if wanted out of the Beijing Olympics, said the Los Angeles Times in an editorial. It paid more than $41 billion, and reaped a mountain of gold medals, along with international approval despite its human rights abuses. “Yet what planners in Beijing miscalculated is that no matter how well you teach performers to smile, the strain behind the lips is still detectable.”

After China’s “super-coordinated” extravaganza, said Anne Applebaum in The Washington Post, the 2012 Games should be delightfully messy. Londoners will grouse about the traffic, politicians will carp about money, the notoriously “snarky” British press will call the ceremonies “tasteless”—but protesters won’t be intimidated, and everyone will have “a lot more fun.”

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

Thank you for reading 5 articles this month*

Join now for unlimited access

Enjoy your first month for just $1

*Read 5 free articles per month without a subscription
After your trial you will be billed $7.99 per month, cancel anytime. Or sign up for one year for just $79