Feature

Musharraf gives a little ground

Pakistani leader Gen. Pervez Musharraf this week began to release hundreds of political prisoners and vowed to hang up his army uniform within days, though he refused to end the emergency rule he declared early this month. A Musharraf aide described the m

Pakistani leader Gen. Pervez Musharraf this week began to release hundreds of political prisoners and vowed to hang up his army uniform within days, though he refused to end the emergency rule he declared early this month. A Musharraf aide described the moves as a “goodwill gesture” to ensure a level playing field in national elections scheduled for Jan. 8. But opposition leaders said holding an election under emergency rule, during which free assembly has been banned and non-government broadcasters silenced, would be a sham.  

As part of his crackdown, Musharraf arrested Supreme Court judges who had questioned the legality of his bid to seek another term. But this week, the court, stocked with judges picked by Musharraf, dismissed the challenges to Musharraf’s rule, virtually guaranteeing him another term.  

President Bush, in an interview with ABC News, signaled that Musharraf was not in danger of losing U.S. support. “I think he is truly somebody who believes in democracy,” Bush said, describing Musharraf as “a man of his word.”
In truth, Musharraf has made a mockery of Bush’s dream of promoting democracy, said the Columbus, Ohio, Dispatch in an editorial. But Bush has the tools to force free elections. The U.S. has handed $10 billion in aid to Pakistan since 9/11. Faced with a cutoff of that largess, Musharraf would be “pressured until he realizes he has no choice but to allow free elections.”

Let’s get real, said Paul Moorcraft in The Washington Times. “The immediate alternative to Gen. Musharraf is not democracy but anarchy and/or rule by Islamic extremists.” It’s far from clear that any of Musharraf’s would-be successors would be able to do as much to keep Islamic extremists in check, to say nothing about keeping control over the nation’s nuclear weapons. All the “ritual tut-tutting” from the West doesn’t change the scary reality on the ground.

That’s why the U.S. should be drawing up military contingencies, said Frederick W. Kagan and Michael O’Hanlon in The New York Times. If Pakistan’s government collapses, al Qaida sympathizers in tribal areas could spin out of control, or Islamic extremists in the army could try to seize power. “We must face a fact: The U.S. simply could not stand by as a nuclear-armed Pakistan descended into the abyss.”

Recommended

Ukraine hints it destroyed Russian missile shipment in Crimea
China's Xi Jinping and Russia's Vladimir Putin
Awkward

Ukraine hints it destroyed Russian missile shipment in Crimea

Global happiness has been 'remarkably resilient' over the past three years
cathedral in Finland.
it wasn't all bad

Global happiness has been 'remarkably resilient' over the past three years

Is France 'on the edge of civil unrest'?
Protests against Macron's pension overhaul
Today's big question

Is France 'on the edge of civil unrest'?

The extreme weather events of 2023
An illustration of a tornado and wind-swept palm trees
In depth

The extreme weather events of 2023

Most Popular

The truth about alcohol
Alcohol being poured into a rocks glass.
Briefing

The truth about alcohol

Russia's spring Ukraine offensive may be winding down amid heavy losses
Ukrainian tank fires near Bakhmut
Attrition

Russia's spring Ukraine offensive may be winding down amid heavy losses

North Korea claims 800,000 people volunteered to fight against the U.S.
North Korean soldiers march in a parade in 2018.
A Frightening Figure

North Korea claims 800,000 people volunteered to fight against the U.S.