Pakistan's showdown continues

Pakistani activists said mass arrests of lawyers and opposition politicians had grown into an unprecedented assault on civil society. It would "fit the American soul" to side with the protesters, said The Seattle Times, but stability comes first

What happened

Pakistani activists said mass arrests of lawyers and opposition politicians had grown into an unprecedented assault on civil society, The Washington Post reported Wednesday. President Pervez Musharraf imposed military rule over the weekend and ousted Iftikhar Mohammed Chaudhry, the chief justice of the Supreme Court. Chaudhry said the country’s constitution was being “ripped to shreds,” and he urged lawyers to continue protesting.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

If Pakistanis want to change their country, the last thing the U.S. should do is meddle, said David Ignatius in The Washington Post (free registration). We tried that in Iran nearly 30 years ago, when Iranians were protesting to get rid of our “friend,” the Shah. That didn’t exactly work out the way we hoped, and if we meddle in Pakistan we’ll only “get things wrong” again.

Washington has already gotten things wrong by trusting Musharraf, said Mohammed Hanif in The New York Times (free registration). “General Musharraf has always tried to cultivate an impression in the West that he is the only one holding the country together, that after him we can only expect anarchy. But in a country where arts teachers and lawyers are behind bars and suicide bombers are allowed to go free, we definitely need to redefine anarchy.”