Elections in Egypt
Except for a bit of violence, said Cairo’s government-controlled Al-Ahram in an editorial, Egypt’s parliamentary elections last week were a “totally positive” experience. The three rounds of voting were an exercise of democracy that Egypt should be proud of. It’s too bad, of course, that some provocateurs from the Muslim Brotherhood party forced police to intervene at a few of the polling places. Still, even the “turmoil and disturbances” can be seen as a sign that Egypt’s democracy is maturing. After all, “dialogue—even if it is loud and lacks discipline—is the key to freedom.”
The irony is that the government encouraged the brotherhood to run, said Sulayman Judah in Cairo’s Al-Misri al-Yawm. Apparently the ruling party thought that it would look good in comparison if its only rival was a bunch of Islamic fundamentalists. So the government “stifled all of the legitimate opposition parties.” In the run-up to the elections, the secular and liberal parties—never very strong to begin with in this authoritarian country—were effectively denied the ability to campaign. The Muslim Brotherhood, meanwhile, “was freely roaming around society using illegal channels, away from the arm of the law.” Since it has long been banned, it isn’t officially a real party, so it could ignore all the hoops the others had to jump through and mount a grass-roots campaign. The government just never expected that campaign to be so successful.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
No matter how it got there, having the Muslim Brotherhood in the Egyptian parliament is a net gain, said the London-based, Arabic-language Al-Arab al-Alamiyah in an editorial. The party has come a long way since the 1950s, when it tried to assassinate President Gamal Abdel Nasser, or the 1980s, when it was accused of involvement in the killing of President Anwar Sadat. Over the last several decades the brotherhood has convincingly renounced violence, “even though thousands of its activists have been arrested.” Now it has a chance to prove that it can be the legitimate opposition that Egypt badly needs. It can dissent and debate in parliament, and call attention to the rampant corruption in politics. “What is happening in Egypt now is the beginning of a more democratic and liberal future.”
Muhammad Hasan al-Alfi
Nahdat Misr
