Washington, D.C.
The Supreme Court ruled this week that states can punish Ku Klux Klansmen for setting crosses on fire. Cross burning, the court ruled in a 6-3 vote, is not a form of speech protected by the First Amendment. When the case was argued in December, Justice Clarence Thomas, the court’s only black judge, heatedly said that cross burning was a tool of intimidation that the Ku Klux Klan and other white-supremacy groups had used on African-Americans in a century-long “reign of terror.” Thomas said the First Amendment guarantee of free speech did not apply to anyone who tried to “terrorize and intimidate to make their point.” The court’s ruling upholds a Virginia law banning cross burning, which a lower court had ruled was a violation of free-speech guarantees.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
-
‘Autarky and nostalgia aren’t cure-alls’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Japan’s Princess Aiko is a national star. Her fans want even more.IN THE SPOTLIGHT Fresh off her first solo state visit to Laos, Princess Aiko has become the face of a Japanese royal family facing 21st-century obsolescence
-
Australia’s teen social media ban takes effectSpeed Read Kids under age 16 are now barred from platforms including YouTube, TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, Snapchat and Reddit
