Washington, D.C.
The Supreme Court ruled this week that only juries, not judges, can send criminals to the death chamber. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, writing for the court’s 7-2 majority, said that letting a judge decide whether a crime was cruel or heinous enough to warrant death “senselessly diminished” a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial. The decision called into question the sentences of more than 150 death-row inmates in Arizona, Idaho, Montana, Colorado, and Nebraska, who were convicted by juries but sentenced by judges. Four other states—Florida, Alabama, Delaware, and Indiana—may have to change their capital-punishment laws, because they give judges final say after jurors deliver an advisory verdict on whether a killer should live or die.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
-
The marvelous powers of mucusThe Explainer It's snot just a pesky cold symptom
-
What to know about the 'no tax on tips' policyThe Explainer The new bill would make tip income exempt from federal income taxes
-
Dehorning rhinos sharply cuts poaching, study findsSpeed Read The painless procedure may be an effective way to reduce the widespread poaching of rhinoceroses
