Washington, D.C.
The Supreme Court ruled this week that only juries, not judges, can send criminals to the death chamber. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, writing for the court’s 7-2 majority, said that letting a judge decide whether a crime was cruel or heinous enough to warrant death “senselessly diminished” a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial. The decision called into question the sentences of more than 150 death-row inmates in Arizona, Idaho, Montana, Colorado, and Nebraska, who were convicted by juries but sentenced by judges. Four other states—Florida, Alabama, Delaware, and Indiana—may have to change their capital-punishment laws, because they give judges final say after jurors deliver an advisory verdict on whether a killer should live or die.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
-
Nnela Kalu’s historic Turner Prize winTalking Point Glasgow-born artist is first person with a learning disability to win Britain’s biggest art prize
-
Bridget Riley: Learning to See – an ‘invigorating and magical ensemble’The Week Recommends The English artist’s striking paintings turn ‘concentration into reverie’
-
‘Stakeknife’: MI5’s man inside the IRAThe Explainer Freddie Scappaticci, implicated in 14 murders and 15 abductions during the Troubles, ‘probably cost more lives than he saved’, investigation claims
