Moussaoui
Did he deserve the death penalty?
On his judgment day, Zacarias Moussaoui had a final message for America, said Neil Lewis in The New York Times. Sentenced to life in solitary confinement for his role in the Sept. 11 attacks, the al Qaida operative erupted into a defiant diatribe in the federal courtroom in Alexandria, Va. 'œAmerica, you lost!' he shouted after the jury's verdict was read. 'œI won!' A visibly angry Judge Leonie M. Brinkema told him, 'œYou came here to be a martyr, and to die in a great big bang of glory. But to paraphrase the poet T.S. Eliot, instead you will die with a whimper. It's quite clear who won and who lost.'
Sadly, it isn't clear at all, said National Review in an editorial. As a committed member of al Qaida, Moussaoui was a soldier in an army waging war against the United States. He should have been tried in a military court as an alien enemy combatant, 'œnot entitled to the protections of either criminal defendants or real soldiers.' Instead, said Peggy Noonan in Opinionjournal.com, Moussaoui used our lenient legal system to get gullible jurors to spare his life. His lawyers apparently convinced the jury that 'œmitigating factors'—an abusive father and childhood encounters with racism—had turned him into the hate-filled monster on display in the courtroom. This is nuts. Imprisoned on a visa violation weeks before 9/11, Moussaoui knew of the looming slaughter and said nothing, dooming 2,700 people to a terrible death. He's as guilty as the hijackers who flew the planes. 'œIf Moussaoui didn't deserve the death penalty, who does?'
Only those actually convicted of murder, said Dahlia Lithwick in Slate.com. Moussaoui may have wanted to kill Americans, but he was in a jail cell when 9/11 occurred—and in this country, we don't execute people for their intentions. Moussaoui, a clearly deranged man, presented several grandiose and conflicting versions of his supposed assignment on 9/11; the prosecution eagerly seized upon these dubious scenarios so it could blame someone—anyone—for that catastrophic attack. But in resisting the attempt to turn Moussaoui into 'œa scapegoat,' the jury made a 'œcourageous' decision. Locked in solitary inside a 7-foot-by-12-foot concrete cell, Moussaoui will soon find that his victory is hollow indeed, said Froma Harrop in The Providence Journal. 'œHe'll be left to rot behind bars and die too old to enjoy the imagined virgins. That is the most appropriate punishment and also the best revenge.'
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
David Cole
The Washington Post
Bruce Shapiro
The Nation
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Will California's EV mandate survive Trump, SCOTUS challenge?
Today's Big Question The Golden State's climate goal faces big obstacles
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
'Underneath the noise, however, there’s an existential crisis'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
2024: the year of distrust in science
In the Spotlight Science and politics do not seem to mix
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Voting: Should ex-felons regain the right to cast ballots?
feature Attorney General Eric Holder denounced state laws that restrict convicted felons from voting after they’re released from jail.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Gun control: Has Newtown already been forgotten?
feature Three months after Newtown, meaningful gun-control legislation seems doomed to failure.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Gay marriage: How will the Supreme Court rule?
feature In March, the court will consider challenges to the constitutionality of both the Defense of Marriage Act and California’s Proposition 8.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
The Supreme Court: Did Obama try to bully the justices?
feature The president's public caution to the Supreme Court unleashed a flurry of opinion.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Health care: Will the Supreme Court judge fairly?
feature Before last week’s Supreme Court hearings, most legal experts assumed the health-care law would be upheld.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Obama: Did his appointments violate the Constitution?
feature The President's recess appointments to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the National Labor Relations Board have raised the ire of Republicans, who say the Senate was not really in recess.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
The death penalty: Was an innocent man executed?
feature In Georgia, Troy Davis was executed for the 1989 shooting of an off-duty policeman, Mark MacPhail, in spite of recanted testimony.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Guns: Would tougher laws have prevented a massacre?
feature Since Martin Luther King Jr. and Robert Kennedy were gunned down in 1968, more than a million Americans have died of gunshots, in crimes, accidents, and suicides.
By The Week Staff Last updated