The real price of a diamond

And more of the week's best financial advice

A diamond ring.
(Image credit: krblokhin/iStock)

Here are three of the week's top pieces of financial advice, gathered from around the web:

Weighing in at the office

The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

The real price of a diamond

The "three-month rule" for engagement rings is an illusion, said Quoctrung Bui at The New York Times. You know the old rule of thumb, rooted in a De Beers ad, that a proper ring should cost about three months' salary. A poll of 1,640 people revealed that actually the typical American spends about 4 percent of a year's income on a ring, or two weeks' pay. The median price was $1,900, with most purchases falling in the $500 to $3,000 range. Overall spending increased with higher incomes — but the percentage of income spent remained "remarkably flat." The process of buying a ring, however, has changed. "More couples are shopping together and discussing what they want and what they can afford."

Senate student loan proposal

Senate Republicans have proposed overhauling the student loan system so that "borrowers would have their monthly bills automatically deducted from their paychecks," said Annie Nova at CNBC. Currently there are more than a dozen ways to repay education debt, which has swelled to an average of around $30,000. Under the new proposal, there'd be only two: capping borrowers' monthly bills at 10 percent of discretionary income or ­spreading the payments out over a decade. Proponents of the plan say it would "streamline the student loan system and protect" some 40 million borrowers. But critics are calling it "mandatory wage garnishment" that will unfairly let companies know the details of their employees' debt.