The inheritance boom

And more of the week's best financial insights

A will.
(Image credit: ilkercelik/iStock)

Here are three of the week's top pieces of financial insights, gathered from around the web:

The inheritance boom

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

The devil is in the details

Beware of the footnotes in corporate earnings reports, said Julie Segal at Institutional Investor. Many investors have suspected that companies use "accounting maneuvers" to distort the results they disclose to the public. Now a new study from Harvard Business School and MIT's Sloan School of Management confirms that, finding a pattern of companies ­burying nonoperating income-statement items in the footnotes as well as in the "management, discussion & analysis" sections of regulatory filings. Often the information hidden in the fine print involves "unusual or one-time gains" that might not be "apparent to investors analyzing income statements." As a result of the misdirection, "earnings for the S&P 500 were distorted by 22 percent on average in 2018." That's part of a "rapid rise in earnings distortion since 2015."

Betting big on a few picks

An increasing number of active fund managers are concentrating their bets on just a few stocks to differentiate themselves from low-cost index funds, said Mischa Frankl-Duval at The Wall Street Journal. Assets managed by funds that hold fewer than 35 stocks have tripled. Advocates of the strategy say that having "fewer stocks allows funds to provide investors with only their best ideas," pointing to investors like George Soros and John Paulson as successful examples. But there is a risk to breaking from conventional wisdom, and the most highly concentrated portfolios — those with 20 or fewer investments — have returned 190 percent since 2009, versus 322 percent for the S&P 500.