It is quite fitting that Los Angeles’ new Lucas Museum of Narrative Art looks like a spaceship since it is the “colossal pet project” of the man behind the “Star Wars” franchise, George Lucas, said The Washington Post. Thought to cost an “eye-popping” $1 billion (£756 million), the art inside is a “dizzying mix” of Renaissance and baroque paintings, digital reproductions, a Naboo N-1 Starfighter and “great heaps of the finest dreck”.
At the museum’s official opening, Lucas’s co-founder and wife Mellody Hobson said the collection’s broad scope was intentional, as narrative art should be anything that “depicts the myths that anchor us, the stories that we believe in”. But for many in the art world such a statement subverts the traditional principles of art and signals a worrying trend towards more superficial art curation.
“There is something so cinematic, commercial and kitsch” about it; it is definitely in the right city – “home of the Hollywood hills and tills”, said The Economist. There is a “certain scorning of traditional expertise”: very few exhibits display accompanying text to explain what they are and why they’re there. “Snooty critics may sneer”, but Lucas wants people “looking at the image and not the history lesson”.
Disconnecting art from its history in this way “sidelines the moral, ethical and cultural content of the story”, added The Washington Post. It’s as though the museum is dedicated to “the anti-intellectual proposition that art is feeling and experiencing, not thinking” by getting rid of “all the old hierarchies, categories and distinctions”, and replacing them with “anything that feels cinematic”. It’s a “bewildering” yet also “astonishing pantheon of disparate but recognisable images”. It will be “extraordinarily popular”.
|