The Week The Week
flag of US
US
flag of UK
UK
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE

Less than $3 per week

Sign in
  • View Profile
  • Sign out
  • The Explainer
  • Talking Points
  • The Week Recommends
  • Newsletters
  • Cartoons
  • From the Magazine
  • The Week Junior
  • More
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Business
    • Health
    • Science
    • Food & Drink
    • Travel
    • Culture
    • History
    • Personal Finance
    • Puzzles
    • Photos
    • The Blend
    • All Categories
  • Newsletter sign up Newsletter
  • Sunday Shortlist, from The Week
    A ‘revelatory’ show, and a ‘genuinely scary’ production

     
    EXHIBITION REVIEW

    Nigerian Modernism

    Tate Modern’s ‘entrancing’ show includes 250 works examining Nigerian art pre- and post-independence

    In October 1960, Nigeria won full independence from the UK, said Anny Shaw in London’s The Standard. This landmark moment sparked a “period of enormous cultural fecundity”, as artists sought to create a “visual identity” for the country – one that embraced indigenous traditions and the “buzz” of modern life, while reckoning with Nigeria’s “fraught colonial past”.

    Now this cultural “renaissance” is the subject of a new exhibition at Tate Modern, which brings together some 250 pieces – including paintings, sculptures and textiles – by more than 50 artists, to examine Nigerian art pre- and post-independence. The result is a show that is sprawling but compelling, said Mark Hudson in The Independent. Other exhibitions of African art have tended to shy away from showing “the first gropings towards modernity from artists working in isolation from the international art world”, for fear of reinforcing the view that they are “folksy”, but this one lets “the work of those early explorers shine out”.

    There is, unfortunately, a rather “dutiful” tone to this nine-room show, said Alastair Sooke in The Daily Telegraph. The work of important artists such as Ben Enwonwu (who sculpted Elizabeth II in 1957) is foregrounded, but several galleries are given over to various “schools”, as the exhibition strives to be properly “in depth”. Along the way there are “flashes of artistic magic” including Demas Nwoko’s “mysterious” paintings, and J.D. ’Okhai Ojeikere’s “astonishing” black and white 1970s photographs of women’s “intricate hairstyles”. But between them are a host of “middling” works, including too many early 20th-century pieces reflecting African artists’ new interest in naturalism. It becomes a bit wearing, like double history on a sunny afternoon.

    I completely disagree, said Jackie Wullschläger in the Financial Times. The show is full of brilliant things – and “what shines throughout is a sparkling diversity of making”. A piece by Asiru Olatunde, who came from a family of blacksmiths, is a sheet of aluminium hammered into “a massive, exquisitely detailed frieze” depicting village life. We also see the Yoruba gods that Adebisi Akanji, who trained as a bricklayer in his youth, sculpted in cement, while the riders in Jimo Akolo’s “Fulani Horsemen” (1962) “gallop right against the picture plane and off to the future”.

    The show’s “star piece”, however, is the series of towering wooden sculptures that Enwonwu made for the forecourt of the Daily Mirror’s London HQ in 1960. There are seven of these figures, each possessed of “traditional attenuated Igbo features” and five of them holding an open newspaper. They disappeared later that decade, and were only rediscovered in 2012, in a garage at a secondary school in east London. This is an “entrancing, enlightening exhibition” – Tate’s “most revelatory in years”.

    Tate Modern, London SE1. Until 10 May

     
     
    THEATRE REVIEW

    Macbeth

    Daniel Raggett’s nightmarish modern-day staging set in gangland Glasgow

    “It’s a bold move to reactivate Stratford’s The Other Place as a regular performance space with ‘Macbeth’,” said Dominic Cavendish in The Daily Telegraph. “This, after all, was the scene of Trevor Nunn’s landmark 1976 production starring Ian McKellen and Judi Dench.”

    Daniel Raggett’s new modern-day staging – set in a boozer in gangland Glasgow – is not in that league, but it “seizes every opportunity to achieve a sense of infernal intimacy”, often plunging the auditorium into darkness, and creating the atmosphere of “a nightmare lock-in”. The witches are a disturbingly ordinary trio of pub gossips. Duncan is a brutal “old capo” who has had the Thane of Cawdor executed; while Macbeth and his peers are thugs fighting to take over his turf. It’s a brutal production, blessed by a fine central performance by Sam Heughan, making his RSC debut.

    Heughan “achieves full tragic weight, especially in the soliloquies”, said Mark Lawson in The Guardian. “Tomorrow and tomorrow” is brilliantly – and shockingly – staged as a kind of grisly slow dance with a dead character. As Lady Macbeth, Lia Williams is a revelation. She makes the verse “vernacular”, and some lines as “modern as the Pinter” at which she has previously excelled. The text adapts “enjoyably well to a drinking den” setting, and the production is “genuinely scary”.

    It’s certainly not for the fainthearted, said Michael Davies on WhatsOnStage: some moments are over the top nasty. As for the concept, it works well in some respects. The rivalries and shifting powers between thanes transfer effectively to gangland Glasgow; but it also has fatal flaws. Shakespeare’s Duncan is a “most sainted king”, yet here he is a hardman with no “virtues” to be mourned. Macbeth is a valiant warrior undone by his inadequacies – but in this telling he leads Macduff’s son off stage carrying a hammer, to “dispatch the lethal blow himself”. Thus a “mighty tragedy” is reduced to a “seedy bar brawl for control over a bunch of thugs for whom it is impossible to feel any empathy”.

    The Other Place, Stratford-upon-Avon. Until 6 December

     
     
    PODCAST review

    Coining It 

    On Lewis Goodall’s regular podcasting gig, “The News Agents”, I sometimes find him (and his co-hosts) a bit “bombastic”, said Miranda Sawyer in The Observer. But he’s incisive, thorough, and (unlike many podcast presenters) he does the necessary legwork. Now he has a “fabulously entertaining” new podcast, Coining It, on which he does a “sterling job making sense of what, by any standards, is a brilliantly nutty tale”. It concerns a man named James Parker who, in 2017 – while ill, and living on benefits in Blackpool – stumbled across a glitch in a bitcoin trading site. He managed to purloin cryptocurrency worth £24.5 million, and spent the money with reckless abandon – moving into a flashy hotel, buying cars for new friends, and giving homeless people wads of cash. This is a “romp of a series that somehow keeps you on everyone’s side all at once, whether Parker, his greedy new compadres, his loyal old friends or the police who chase him down”.

     
     
    BOOK OF THE WEEK

    The Rose Field

    by Philip Pullman

    Philip Pullman’s “magnificent” new novel is the final volume in his “The Book of Dust” trilogy, which expands on “His Dark Materials”, his previous “unsurpassed” trilogy for children, said Philip Womack in The Daily Telegraph. All these novels are set in the same world − one “tantalisingly close to ours”, but with key differences, such as the fact that humans there are accompanied by souls in animal form, known as “dæmons”.

    There were some who thought “His Dark Materials” unsuitable for children, owing to Pullman’s “stringent attacks on Christianity”. “The Book of Dust” really isn’t for children: Pullman uses the series to delve deeper into various points in the life of his heroine Lyra, whom we first met aged 12, in “Northern Lights”, but who is here a young adult. Mixing elements of fairy tale, “Arabian Nights”, spy and adventure stories, “The Rose Field” critiques various aspects of modern life, including multinational corporations, and is “imbued with melancholy, beginning in a ruin and ending amongst devastation”.

    “At 640 pages“, this book “gives itself the time it needs to bring Pullman’s trilogy to a fitting conclusion”, said Sarah Crown in The Guardian. The route it takes is at times a bit circuitous – minor characters appear “without definite purpose”; there are narrative “cul-de-sacs” – but the “internal motor is strong enough” to carry the reader to the “nail-biting” final showdown. If at the very end there’s a “sense of threads left unknotted”, then perhaps that is only fitting: “The Book of Dust” is “a story for grown-ups”, and “storybook endings” are one of the casualties “of the putting away of childish things”.

     
     
    OBITUARY

    Björn Andrésen

    The reluctant young star of Death in Venice

    Björn Andrésen won screen immortality aged 16, when he appeared as Tadzio, the sailor-suited Polish boy whose beauty bewitches an ageing homosexual composer in Luchino Visconti’s 1971 adaptation of Thomas Mann’s “Death in Venice”. The film caused a sensation on its release, said The Daily Telegraph, and was hailed as a masterpiece. Visconti dubbed its child star “the most beautiful boy in the world”, a tag that was taken up by the press. But for Andrésen, the whole thing was a nightmare that, he said, “screwed up my life quite decently”. 

    He was born in Stockholm in 1955. He was never told his father’s identity; and when he was 10, his mother died by suicide. It was his grandmother who pushed him into acting because, he said, she “wanted a celebrity in the family”. She sent him off to multiple auditions, one of which was for “Death in Venice” – Visconti having cast his net widely for a child with the requisite “pure beauty”. At the screen test, Visconti told the boy to undress and pose shirtless in skimpy swimwear. In the footage, Andrésen looks deeply uneasy – and things were little better when they started filming, in the heat of a Venetian summer. “Luchino was the sort of cultural predator who would sacrifice anything or anyone for the work,” Andrésen recalled. With no lines, he was given just four directions: “Go, stop, turn, smile.” His co-star, Dirk Bogarde, wrote in his memoir that to preserve the boy’s alabaster complexion, Visconti never allowed Andrésen “to go into the sun, kick a football about, swim in the polluted sea or do anything which might have given him the smallest degree of pleasure”. 

    The film made him an overnight star. Visconti took him to gay clubs, which he detested, and sent him on a promotional tour to Japan, where he was mobbed. He was ill-prepared for fame, said The Times, and found it hard to resume ordinary life. “You come back to school and you hear, ‘Hi there, angel lips,’” he recalled. He was still only a teenager, but in a 2021 documentary, “The Most Beautiful Boy in the World”, he said that he was treated like “a sex object. Big game.” People often assumed that he was gay, and in his early 20s he was offered gifts and places to live by rich older men. “I thought it was because they liked me. But actually, I was just a trophy.” He had been “naive”, he admitted. He stopped accepting work that had anything to do with his looks, and grew a long beard. In 1983, he married Susanna Román, a poet. In 1986, their baby son died of sudden infant death syndrome. He blamed himself, descended into depression, and disappeared from view for several years. His final film role was in “Midsommar”, a hit 2019 horror movie. In 2021, he was reported to be living alone in a rented flat. “My career is one of the few that started at the absolute top and then worked its way down,” he said. “That was lonely.”

     
     

    Image credits, from top: Bristol Museum and Art Gallery; Helen Murray; Penguin / David Fickling Books; TCD / Prod.DB / Alamy
     

    Recent editions

    • Evening Review

      The job market at a standstill

    • Morning Report

      Trump unfurls red carpet for white South Africans

    • Evening Review

      Has the House become irrelevant?

    VIEW ALL
    TheWeek
    • About Us
    • Contact Future's experts
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy
    • Advertise With Us
    • FAQ
    Add as a preferred source on Google

    The Week is part of Future US Inc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site.

    © Future US, Inc. Full 7th Floor, 130 West 42nd Street, New York, NY 10036.