Elon Musk has never met a problem he couldn't throw his fortune at. The Tesla CEO is putting his historic wealth toward reelecting Donald Trump, particularly in Pennsylvania.
Last weekend, Musk announced he would award $1 million every day to a new, randomly chosen registered Pennsylvania voter who signs a conservative-skewing petition created by his pro-Trump America PAC. "I think this is kind of fun," said Musk. "It seems like a good use of money basically."
What did the commentators say? While Musk has succeeded at pulling eyeballs, the first two recipients were Republican voters who had "already cast their ballots by mail," said Politico. This raises the question of whether the scheme is "activating a new segment of voters" or "just tapping into an existing pool of Musk and Trump fans."
Because the sweepstakes are technically nonpartisan, Democrats can also sign the petition. Democratic entrants would not only "gum up Musk's operation," said Fortune, they could ultimately "drain resources that could have otherwise gone to mobilizing voters for Donald Trump by wasting it on the opposing side."
More importantly, the sweepstakes operates in a "legal gray zone," said Fox News. While paying someone to vote or register to vote is illegal, offering benefits to help people vote is "legal and common," said The New York Times, citing rides to polling places or paid time off to vote. Because Musk is "not directly paying for voter registration but rather for a petition signature that happens to be open only to registered voters," supporters argue it's within legal bounds. Even so, the giveaway may be something that "law enforcement could take a look at," said Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro (D) to NBC.
What next? If he's violating election law, Musk could face up to five years in prison and $10,000 in fines, although he likely wouldn't "suffer such a serious fine," Richard Hasen, an election law professor at UCLA, said to NPR. However, if Musk was "warned that this is illegal activity and continued to do it," that could be different.
To that end, a group of former Justice Department officials and Republican lawmakers have petitioned Attorney General Merrick Garland to investigate, arguing in a letter obtained by The Washington Post that the sweepstakes is in clear legal violation. Although law enforcement is "appropriately reluctant to take action shortly before elections," the letter said, "serious questions arising under laws that directly regulate the voting process must be an exception." |