In 2017, just weeks into Donald Trump's first term in office, The Washington Post announced a new slogan: "Democracy Dies in Darkness." The mantra quickly became a rallying cry for the media at large during the tumult of the Trump administration. As Trump awaits another Election Day, the slogan is back in the spotlight — this time in light of the paper's decision to nix a planned endorsement of Kamala Harris. The decision was allegedly "made by owner Jeff Bezos," the Post's union said on X.
Although the impact may be electorally minimal, the implications of such a move may be more concerning. "This is cowardice, a moment of darkness that will leave democracy as a casualty," former Post editor Marty Baron said to NPR. Trump "will celebrate this as an invitation to further intimidate" media owners.
What did the commentators say? The Post's decision to cancel its endorsement, coupled with a similar decision by the Los Angeles Times not to endorse a candidate this year, is an example of "anticipatory obedience," said the Columbia Journalism Review. Owners like Bezos and the Los Angeles Times' Patrick Soon-Shiong are preemptively acting out of fear that if Trump wins, he could "take vengeance on companies that cross him." What's the use of having a net worth over $200 billion if Bezos can't buy "fearlessness in the face of a carnival-barking, would-be authoritarian?" said Brian McGrory at The Boston Globe.
The nonendorsement has "already seemed to be impacting subscriptions," said Semafor. Some 2,000 people canceled within 24 hours after the announcement — an "unusually high number," according to one Post employee. By midday Monday, 200,000 people had canceled their subscriptions, said NPR.
But cancellations "do Donald Trump's work for him," by weakening these institutions, Baron said to The New Yorker. Canceling a newspaper subscription "helps politicians who don't want oversight," said CNN's Jake Tapper on X. Doing so will ultimately "result in fewer journalists trying to hold the powerful to account." Subscribers should instead be "canceling their Amazon Prime subscriptions," said The Atlantic.
What next? The episode is an "argument against billionaires buying newspapers," said Jarvis DeBerry of MSNBC. While there may have been hell to pay if the Post and the Times had endorsed Harris and then Trump won, that hell will be "visited on more vulnerable people to a much greater degree." It's "unforgivable," then, that these owners are "more concerned with their own interests than the interests of the readers they serve." |