Academic freedom is a pillar of university life. It's a principle that gives professors and students wide leeway to freely explore and express ideas without fear of being penalized. And it may be in danger.
The war in Gaza has sparked fears of a "growing assault on the ideals of academic freedom," said The New York Times. Pro-Palestinian instructors have had contracts canceled, while faculty discipline has increased. It's intended to "ensure that students feel safe on campus," said the Times. But faculty fear a "chill in the air," Peter Lake, the director of the Stetson Center for Excellence in Higher Education Law and Policy in Florida, said to the Times.
What did the commentators say? Academic freedom "comes with special responsibilities," Greg Weiner, the president of Assumption University in Massachusetts, said at The Wall Street Journal. But campus activists treat the concept as a "special entitlement" to pursue political goals "free from consequences." Academic freedom encourages the "pursuit of truth," said Weiner, while political sloganeering can "reduce complicated issues to slogans." That's different.
Law professor Amy Wax received a yearlong suspension from the University of Pennsylvania after she "questioned the academic performance of Black students," said The Associated Press. Academic freedom is important, said Penn's provost, but professors must practice a "willingness to assess all students fairly."
Wax has been "stunningly numb to compassion, courtesy and sometimes even to coherence," said John McWhorter at the Times. But her punishment is "egregious." The ideals of free speech mean "living with the discomfort" that offensive opinions can cause. Yes, Wax's ideas are "repellent," said McWhorter. But "this does not justify punishing her for expressing them."
What next? The battle is underway at Harvard. The university recently punished 25 faculty members who participated in a silent library "study-in" supporting pro-Palestine protesters, said The Harvard Crimson. The university is setting boundaries on activism, said the head of Harvard's library system. The library is "not intended to be used as a venue for a group action."
The presidential election could shape what happens next, said Inside Higher Ed. The election outcome could result in a "push to nationalize" restrictions on "universities' autonomy," including laws governing curricula and cracking down on diversity, equity and inclusion programs, said Jeremy Young, a program director at PEN America. A stronger case needs to be made to voters and taxpayers that they benefit from allowing universities to be a "place of intellectual freedom." |