Pope Benedict was an ardent defender of Catholic traditions. Pope Francis, who died yesterday, chose a more liberal direction. So which way might the church, famously resistant to change, move under his successor?
Papal successions are "not like presidential transitions," said Anthony Faiola and Michelle Boorstein at The Washington Post. New popes do not "openly set about undoing the legacy" of their predecessors. But much can change in "style, emphasis, guidance and law."
Francis backed away from the Latin Mass, allowed priestly blessings of same-sex couples and decentralized the power of the church. But those changes didn't come without controversy and could be reversed.
Leading a church in decline Francis "bent but did not break doctrinal orthodoxy," said Ed Kilgore at New York magazine. Those who hoped to see "full acceptance of gay or divorced Catholics" or the embrace of women in the clergy were disappointed, but the late pontiff still "opened doors once firmly closed." He reshaped the College of Cardinals that will choose his successor, making it more diverse. But everything is in play. The new pope could be a "protégé of Francis or someone inclined to turn back clocks."
Another challenge is the "declining number of Catholics worldwide," said Axios. One of the "greatest failures" of Francis is that he "didn't focus on evangelism," said Andrew Chesnut, a Catholic Studies professor at Virginia Commonwealth University. The next pope will likely "put some focus on appealing to evangelicals," said Axios.
'De-Westernization of the church' The selection of a new pope is "as much political balancing act as spiritual exercise," said Katherine Kelaidis at Vox. The conversation usually focuses on "progressive" and "traditionalist" factions in the "global culture wars." But the "average Christian" is quickly changing. The church is in decline in North America and Europe but rising in Latin America, Asia and Africa. Despite that, the church's "power centers have stayed firmly in the West." That could begin to change.
Pope Francis was "not considered a radical" when he was chosen by the conclave in 2013, said Molly Olmstead at Slate. It's doubtful the cardinals "knew what they were ushering in." So there's no guarantee the next conclave will choose a successor who "shares Francis' more progressive ideals." But whoever comes next, it will be difficult for him to "walk back the de-Westernization of the church." |