In North Carolina, state elections have entered uncharted territory. The state's Republican-led Supreme Court has temporarily blocked the certification to reseat incumbent Justice Allison Riggs, a Democrat, overruling the Democratic-majority Board of Elections, which affirmed her 734-vote win over Republican challenger Jefferson Griffin after two recounts.
Now, the court will not only hear Griffin's challenge to tens of thousands of votes cast, but could very well "decide a winner in the race," said North Carolina's News & Observer — all while providing "scant comment about its reasoning" for blocking Riggs' certification to begin with.
Griffin's argument centers on his claim that around 60,000 ballots across North Carolina's 100 counties were cast by voters who had not "provided election officials with their driver's license number or the last four digits of their Social Security number," The Washington Post said. His request to reject those ballots is largely "based on a theory that has been dismissed by both the state election board and a federal judge," ProPublica said, with officials finding "many legitimate reasons for that information to be missing, including voters registering before state paperwork was updated about a year ago to require those details."
The battle over Riggs' seat is "part of the power struggle that has long animated North Carolina politics," said Vox. It follows "congressional gerrymandering meant to favor the GOP, legal maneuvering weakening the power of incoming Democratic officials and the establishment of a GOP supermajority in North Carolina’s legislature in 2023." |