The Week The Week
flag of US
US
flag of UK
UK
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE

Less than $3 per week

Sign in
  • View Profile
  • Sign out
  • The Explainer
  • Talking Points
  • The Week Recommends
  • Newsletters
  • Cartoons
  • From the Magazine
  • The Week Junior
  • More
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Business
    • Health
    • Science
    • Food & Drink
    • Travel
    • Culture
    • History
    • Personal Finance
    • Puzzles
    • Photos
    • The Blend
    • All Categories
  • Newsletter sign up Newsletter
  • The Week's Saturday Wrap
    MAGA turns on Trump, casting aside empathy, and America’s seeing stones

     
    controversy of the week

    Epstein: Why MAGA won’t move on

    Having “nurtured conspiracy theories for his entire political career,” Donald Trump is suddenly in danger of “being consumed by one,” said Michelle Goldberg in The New York Times. His MAGA movement is “in revolt” this week over the insistence by Trump, his Justice Department, and the FBI that there are no “incriminating client lists” or scandalous new documents to be revealed regarding Jeffrey Epstein, the disgraced financier found dead in his jail cell in 2019 while awaiting trial on charges of trafficking underage girls. The statement sparked immediate “fury and disappointment” on the Right, where MAGA influencers—including now FBI director Kash Patel and his deputy, Dan Bongino—have insisted for years that Epstein was murdered by the Deep State and that the release of a client list would expose a sprawling cabal of elite, liberal pedophiles. Most of the MAGA rage was initially directed at Attorney General Pam Bondi, who said in February she had the Epstein list “sitting on my desk” and then announced last week no list existed. Trump then began taking fire when he implored “weakling” supporters to “not waste Time and Energy on Jeffrey Epstein, somebody that nobody cares about.” But MAGA influencers like Tucker Carlson, Alex Jones, and Steve Bannon are continuing to stoke MAGA’s rage, warning Trump, in Jones’ words, that “this isn’t going away.” 

    Trump’s quandary is that he’s “in the Epstein files,” said William Kristol in The Bulwark. He was friends with Epstein—a neighbor in Palm Beach, Fla.—for 15 years. Trump once said they had a shared taste in “beautiful women,” adding with a chuckle that Epstein liked his “on the younger side.” Trump flew more than once on Epstein’s notorious jet, the “Lolita Express,” and author Michael Wolff recently claimed that Epstein showed him photos taken at his home of topless young women sitting on Trump’s lap. No wonder his DOJ says that “no further disclosure” of Epstein documents, photos, and videos “would be warranted.” To add to the suspicion, said Steve Benen in MSNBC.com, Trump is now saying that the “Epstein files” were “written by Obama, Crooked Hillary, Comey,” and his other political enemies. So is Trump’s position now that the files “do exist but they’re fake?”

    Files from the lengthy federal investigations no doubt exist, said Andrew McCarthy in National Review. But “the Justice Department and the FBI are not in the transparency business,” and it would be highly unethical for them to release documents naming people who associated with Epstein but were not charged with crimes. Good luck convincing MAGA of that, said Josh Marshall in Talking Points Memo. Its cultlike belief that a cabal of “rich and powerful pedophiles” controls the world “runs really, really deep,” and if Trump keeps stonewalling, “the Epstein wildfire” will continue to burn out of control. 

    “This has to be bewildering” for Trump, said Amanda Marcotte in Salon. If his fans can shrug off his own history of sexual assault, why are they so hung up on Epstein? The answer lies in “the age of the victims.” It’s only by positioning themselves as righteous warriors against pedophilia—the through line of MAGA conspiracy theories from Pizzagate to QAnon—that Trump’s supporters find “moral absolution.” Trump fans “need the Epstein files” if they’re to keep seeing themselves as “the good guys.” If they think Trump is protecting pedophiles, they may see him as another villain—and themselves for what they are: his “accomplices.”

     
     
    VIEWPOINT

    What makes us human

    “America’s leaders are increasingly casting aside empathy and compassionate care as dangerous liabilities. Elon Musk has called empathy ‘the fundamental weakness of Western civilization,’ and the Trump administration governs as if that is a guiding principle. The belief that we have a responsibility to others isn’t shortsighted sentimentalism; it’s the moral foundation of a meaningful life. Caring for others is a moral obligation, not a partisan position. If we allow the Trump administration’s assault on empathy to define our global health agenda, or ourselves, we won’t just be turning away from the world—we’ll be turning away from who we are.”

    Craig Spencer in The New York Times

     
     
    briefing

    The all-seeing tech giant

    Palantir’s data-mining tools are used by spies and the military. Are they now being turned on Americans?

    What does Palantir do? 
    Named after the mystical seeing stones in J.R.R. Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings, the secretive tech firm sells software that can crunch colossal troves of data. Depending on the application, that might include GPS data, text messages, social media profiles, legal filings, phone records, and thousands of other information points, which it distills into charts, maps, and other forms of intelligence. Palantir’s specialty is detecting connections and patterns: “the finding of hidden things,” as CEO Alex Karp puts it. The company was launched in 2003 by Peter Thiel, a tech billionaire and major Trump donor, and Karp, a self-described neo-Marxist with a philosophy Ph.D., and seeded with $2 million from the CIA. The intelligence agency used Palantir’s software to track terrorists after 9/11—it is widely believed to have helped the U.S. locate and kill Osama bin Laden—and the firm has helped Ukraine’s military identify Russian targets, Los Angeles police track crime patterns, and JPMorgan Chase combat cyberfraud. But most of Palantir’s work is for the U.S. government, and business is booming. Since President Trump’s January inauguration, it has won more than $900 million in federal contracts, and its share price has more than doubled. “Palantir is on fire,” Karp told a May earnings call.

    Which agencies work with the company? 
    Palantir’s tools are used across many agencies for a wide range of purposes. It has helped the CDC track disease outbreaks, the IRS sniff out tax cheats, the FDA monitor supply chains, and the Department of Homeland Security chase down drug traffickers. Most controversially, during the first Trump administration it helped Homeland Security track undocumented migrants, prompting pushback from employees and protests at Palantir’s Palo Alto and Manhattan offices. In April, CNN and Wired reported that Palantir engineers were helping build a master database that will draw data from across federal agencies—including the IRS, Social Security Administration, and Health and Human Services—to target undocumented immigrants. The firm is “helping build the infrastructure of the police state,” charged tech investor Paul Graham. Palantir’s biggest government client, though, is the Defense Department, with whom it has a $1.3 billion contract running through 2029.

    How does the military use its tech? 
    In Palantir’s early years, the Marine Corps deployed its software in Afghanistan to better predict the locations of roadside bombs and potential insurgent ambushes. The company is now helping the Pentagon develop the Maven Smart System, which uses AI to analyze satellite imagery, drone footage, radar feeds, ground reports, and other data to present commanders with battlefield options. The Pentagon has already used the technology to identify airstrike targets in Yemen, Syria, and Iraq. Palantir has also worked closely with the Ukrainian military, embedding engineers with troops, and recently signed a $91 million deal with Britain’s Defense Ministry. “They are the AI arms dealer of the 21st century,” said Jacob Helberg, a national security expert and outside adviser to Karp. Palantir’s defense work, especially the use of its software by Israel in Gaza, has drawn condemnation from inside and outside the company.

    How has Palantir responded?
    Karp, who’s called himself a “progressive warrior,” acknowledges that using AI-driven algorithms to aid killing is “morally complex.” But he believes that in a world full of malevolent forces bent on America’s destruction, survival depends on leveraging our technological advantages and that tech firms must aid that effort. “A lot of this does come down to, Do you think America is a beacon of good or not?” he said. Palantir aims to help “power the West to its obvious, innate superiority” and “bring violence and death to our enemies.” When it comes to the other key charge leveled at Palantir—that its software is being put to nefarious ends by the government—Karp insists his company can’t dictate how its tools are used. But alarm spiked in May, when The New York Times reported that the Trump administration had tapped the firm to compile Americans’ personal data.

    What kind of information? 
    The federal government has copious data on U.S. citizens, ranging from incomes and student debts to criminal histories, charitable contributions, and medical claims. Such data is currently siloed across agencies. But the Times reported that Trump, who in March signed an executive order directing agencies to remove “unnecessary barriers” to data consolidation, had drafted Palantir to build a centralized database that pulls all that disparate information together.

    Why is there alarm over a centralized database?
    Privacy advocates say that this library of information could be weaponized by the government. Officials could access and release embarrassing details about critics’ finances and health conditions, for example, or terminate benefits they receive. “The creation of a monster uniform database,” said Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), is “an invitation to fraud and political retaliation against the people.” It’s not just Democrats who are raising warnings. Such data consolidation is “a power that history says will eventually be abused,” said Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio). Palantir denies it is building a master database or “enabling mass surveillance” of citizens. But even onetime insiders are troubled by the company’s growing power. In May, 13 ex-Palantir engineers signed a letter saying the firm’s leadership had “abandoned its founding ideals” and become complicit in “normalizing authoritarianism.” They cited the crystal-ball-like “seeing stones” that gave Palantir its name. These magical artifacts were not necessarily a force for good, they noted, but presented “great dangers when wielded by those without wisdom or a moral compass.”

    Palantir’s unlikely CEO 
    After Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, the first Western CEO to meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was a wiry-haired intellectual who practices tai chi and holds a doctorate in neoclassical social theory. That was Palantir’s Karp, who told Zelensky he could help “David to beat a modern-day Goliath.” If Zelensky found Karp an unlikely defense contractor, he wasn’t alone; “batshit crazy” is how Karp recently summed up some investors’ view of him. Raised outside Philadelphia by a far-left Jewish father and Black mother, the Kamala Harris donor is also an odd bedfellow for Peter Thiel. But when choosing a chief executive, Thiel turned to his former Stanford Law classmate, who had no tech or business experience. A self-described introvert, when not traveling Karp skis and shoots guns at his cabin in rural New Hampshire, tended by a staff and team of bodyguards. He says his defense work has made him a “pariah” in Silicon Valley but dismisses what he calls “woke, pagan ideology.” He insists he wants “less war,” and the way to achieve that is to “scare the f--- out of our enemies.”

     
     

    Only in America

    An Ohio Republican congressman has introduced a resolution that would make July 13, the date of the 2024 assassination attempt against Donald Trump, an annual national holiday called Faith and Defiance Day. “You see one or two events in your life that inspire you to be more than you are,” explained Rep. Michael Rulli. “God saved the president that day, and that’s something worth recognizing for the rest of time.”

     
     
    talking points

    Loyalty tests: The purge at the FBI

    FBI Director Kash Patel is determined to know who is talking trash about him, said Adam Goldman in The New York Times. In days past, the agency used lie-detector tests “to sniff out employees who might have betrayed their country,” but under Patel, it’s employing them to grill agents on whether they’ve said anything negative about him. It has even used the tests to hunt for the person who leaked Patel’s request to be assigned a service weapon. This “alarming quest for fealty,” FBI employees say, is “politically charged and highly inappropriate.” Patel, who worked as an aide in the first Trump administration, was a leading critic of the agency before being confirmed to lead it—indeed, he claimed the agency was part of, in his words, a “Deep State plot” against President Trump, and he spread the conspiracy theory that Jan. 6 was a false-flag event. Since taking the helm in February, he has reassigned or forced out hundreds of experienced FBI officials, fueling a culture of fear and distrust.

    Polygraph tests “are regarded as junk science, so it’s a little insane” that the FBI still uses them at all, said Liz Wolfe in Reason. They detect stress, not lies, and they’re not admissible in court. “But it’s especially wild” for Patel to use them to determine loyalty to him personally. “Defending the laws of this country” is what these agents ought to be concerned with. Yet Patel has actually disbanded the squad investigating public corruption—because it was investigating wrongdoing by Trump administration figures. In fact, the FBI may be overdue for a house-cleaning, said Miranda Devine in the New York Post. A “bombshell new CIA review” shows that Deep State actors at the FBI in the late 2010s insisted on pushing highly suspect information to build “a false narrative of Trump-Russia collusion.” That shows the agency was appallingly politicized.

    Yet resorting to polygraphs is “old-style KGB stuff,” said Tom Nichols in The Atlantic. Patel suspects agents “are laughing at him behind his back,” and his solution amounts to “paranoid authoritarianism.” Purging the FBI of veteran agents will only “corrode morale and potentially create more security risks” at a time when the country is in peril. Real spies and terrorists are out there “plotting the deaths of American citizens,” and it should be the FBI’s mission to find them. They’re “waiting to be caught,” but first, “Patel has to find out who snickered at him in the hallway. Priorities, after all.”

     
     

    It wasn’t all bad

    Twenty years ago, Dr. Purva Merchant, a dentist in Seattle, made up an innocuous email for dental school applications that included her nickname, “the Tooth Fairy.” But in 2007, she received an odd email: A mother had forgotten to leave money under their child’s pillow and was emailing the Tooth Fairy to make amends. Merchant responded by apologizing for her busy schedule and promised to visit that night. She’s maintained the helpful charade ever since, receiving and responding to as many as five emails a day. Although she didn’t grow up with the Tooth Fairy in India, she likens her emails to being a child’s pen pal. “There’s something amazing about doing something for someone,” she said, “and they don’t know who you are.”

     
     
    people

    Brinkley’s search for love

    Being a supermodel does not save you from heartbreak, said Alix Strauss in The New York Times. Christie Brinkley has had four husbands— she was 21 when she wed her first, French illustrator Jean-François Allaux—and numerous relationships. “I’m a fool for love,” says Brinkley, 71. “I always believed in soulmates. I thought I had four of them.”

    She left Allaux after six years for “freedom,” and her next serious romance, with French race-car driver Olivier Chandon de Brailles, ended with his death in a 1983 crash. Her second marriage, to singer Billy Joel, lasted nearly a decade. But “with Billy, who captured my heart, my imagination, my everything, there was just too much pressure and drinking, and being overwhelmed with problems. When you become the bad cop, it’s over.” Their 1994 divorce devastated Brinkley, who quickly wed real estate developer Richard Taubman. But he “was a larger-than-life character who married me for my money,” and husband No. 4, architect Peter Cook, cheated on her. “The relationships I was in made me feel unloved. I have enough self-esteem to know that in the right arms, I’m lovable. And I wasn’t loved correctly.” But Brinkley isn’t bitter. “Everything I’ve been through, all the pain, the stupidity, I would do it again because I believe in love. I think it would be sad not to.”

     
     

    Saturday Wrap was written and edited by Theunis Bates, Susan Caskie, Chris Erikson, Bill Falk, Mark Gimein, Allan Kew, Bruno Maddox, Rebecca Nathanson, Tim O’Donnell.

    Image credits, from top: Getty Images; Getty Images; Getty Images; Getty Images
     

    Recent editions

    • Evening Review

      Alligator Alcatraz's conditions

    • Morning Report

      Trump denies penning 'bawdy' Epstein letter

    • Evening Review

      Antisemitic artificial intelligence

    VIEW ALL
    TheWeek
    • About Us
    • Contact Future's experts
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy
    • Advertise With Us

    The Week is part of Future US Inc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site.

    © Future US, Inc. Full 7th Floor, 130 West 42nd Street, New York, NY 10036.