Facebook will make it easier for politicians to hide their wildest beliefs


Facebook will tweak its content moderation policies, the social network announced Friday, ending some special leeway for politicians. Previously, elected officials were granted a newsworthiness exception for content that would be removed — or even result in account suspension — if shared by ordinary users. That exception will be granted far more rarely and transparently going forward.
I'm not convinced deleting politicians' posts is a good idea. It's not that it's all newsworthy: Five years of former President Donald Trump's tweets disabused me of the old journalistic assumption of inherent official newsworthiness. Nor do I think Facebook should be forced to host this stuff. But I do see in Facebook a useful temptation to politicians who believe false, unethical, and otherwise objectionable things: a place to announce to the voting public views they might otherwise manage to conceal. Shouldn't we want to know if people seeking or holding positions of power believe false or unethical things? Isn't that crucial information about how they'll wield their power?
Deplatforming these politicians — ousting them from social networks — is attractive in its moral simplicity, and certainly it did a lot to quiet Trump (whom the Facebook announcement said will be given a conditional return to the platform after a two-year suspension). Yet it can have all sorts of unwanted consequences, including leaving voters ignorant of the wild ideas officials entertain; making those ideas more attractive to some people by virtue of their being "forbidden;" and driving some of those people to fringier platforms where, without pushback from users who disagree with them, their thinking becomes even more misguided.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
A more productive approach might be something like what tech journalist Charlie Warzel discussed in his email newsletter in April: adding "friction" to curtail the spread of content, like a limited post rate (say, three posts per week) or a multi-day delay between post submission and publication. Misinformation benefits from unfettered volume and speed, Warzel notes, as "bad actors ... publish quickly and gain a huge advantage over authoritative news outlets that take time to vet information before sharing it." Friction would cut into that advantage without concealing politicians' true views from the public.
The greatest service Facebook could do this country is to pull its own plug. Failing that, introducing friction — and ideally for everyone, not only politicians — would be prudent.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Bonnie Kristian was a deputy editor and acting editor-in-chief of TheWeek.com. She is a columnist at Christianity Today and author of Untrustworthy: The Knowledge Crisis Breaking Our Brains, Polluting Our Politics, and Corrupting Christian Community (forthcoming 2022) and A Flexible Faith: Rethinking What It Means to Follow Jesus Today (2018). Her writing has also appeared at Time Magazine, CNN, USA Today, Newsweek, the Los Angeles Times, and The American Conservative, among other outlets.
-
Nicola Sturgeon's memoir: making the personal political
Talking Point Former Scottish first minister attempts to set record straight in 'Frankly' but does she leave more questions than answers?
-
Trump-Putin: would land swap deal end Ukraine war?
Today's Big Question Ukraine ready to make 'painful but acceptable' territorial concessions – but it still might not be enough for Vladimir Putin
-
The truth about sunscreen
The Explainer The science behind influencer claims that sun cream is toxic
-
Trump-Putin: would land swap deal end Ukraine war?
Today's Big Question Ukraine ready to make 'painful but acceptable' territorial concessions – but it still might not be enough for Vladimir Putin
-
Israel: Losing the American public
Feature A recent poll finds American support for Israel's military action in Gaza has fallen from 50% to 32%
-
Unmaking Americans: Trump aims to revoke citizenship
Feature Trump is threatening to revoke the citizenship of foreign-born Americans. Could he do that?
-
Trump: Redesigning the White House
Feature Donald Trump unveiled a $200 million plan to build a White House ballroom
-
Texas gerrymander battle spreads to other states
Feature If Texas adopts its new electoral map, blue states plan to retaliate with Democrat-favored districts
-
Trump hikes tariffs despite economic warning signs
Feature Donald Trump signed an executive order raising import taxes to the highest level in over a century, as U.S. job growth continues to lag
-
Why is Trump attacking Intel's CEO?
Today's Big Question Concerns about Lip-Bu Tan's Chinese connections
-
Trump sends FBI to patrol DC, despite falling crime
Speed Read Washington, D.C., 'has become one of the most dangerous cities anywhere in the world,' Trump said