The Clintons gave $100,000 to a New York Times charity in 2008 — just before the paper endorsed Clinton for president
The Washington Free Beacon has revealed that the Clinton Family Foundation donated $100,000 to The New York Times Neediest Cases Fund in 2008. That year, the Times endorsed Hillary Clinton in the Democratic presidential primary.
According to the Free Beacon, the Times was reportedly leaning toward endorsing Obama in 2008, rather than Clinton, but the board was overruled by Times chairman and publisher Arthur Sulzberger Jr. At the time, Vanity Fair reported that one of Clinton's financial backers lobbied Sulzberger for the Times' endorsement.
On January 25, 2008, the Times' editorial board wrote that Clinton was "more qualified" to be president than Obama and John Edwards.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
For the Times' part, a spokesperson told Politico that "the Free Beacon story is preposterous from start to finish." The Free Beacon notes, however, that the Clinton Family Foundation, which distributes more than $1 million a year to various causes, hasn't donated to the Neediest Cases Fund since its gift in 2008.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Meghan DeMaria is a staff writer at TheWeek.com. She has previously worked for USA Today and Marie Claire.
-
The 8 best hospital dramas of all timethe week recommends From wartime period pieces to of-the-moment procedurals, audiences never tire of watching doctors and nurses do their lifesaving thing
-
‘Implementing strengthened provisions help advance aviation safety’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
How Manchesterism could change the UKThe Explainer The idea involves shifting a centralized government to more local powers
-
Fed holds rates steady, bucking Trump pressureSpeed Read The Federal Reserve voted to keep its benchmark interest rate unchanged
-
Judge slams ICE violations amid growing backlashSpeed Read ‘ICE is not a law unto itself,’ said a federal judge after the agency violated at least 96 court orders
-
Rep. Ilhan Omar attacked with unknown liquidSpeed Read This ‘small agitator isn’t going to intimidate me from doing my work’
-
Democrats pledge Noem impeachment if not firedSpeed Read Trump is publicly defending the Homeland Security secretary
-
The billionaires’ wealth tax: a catastrophe for California?Talking Point Peter Thiel and Larry Page preparing to change state residency
-
Hegseth moves to demote Sen. Kelly over videospeed read Retired Navy fighter pilot Mark Kelly appeared in a video reminding military service members that they can ‘refuse illegal orders’
-
Trump says US ‘in charge’ of Venezuela after Maduro grabSpeed Read The American president claims the US will ‘run’ Venezuela for an unspecified amount of time, contradicting a statement from Secretary of State Marco Rubio
-
Bari Weiss’ ‘60 Minutes’ scandal is about more than one reportIN THE SPOTLIGHT By blocking an approved segment on a controversial prison holding US deportees in El Salvador, the editor-in-chief of CBS News has become the main story
