The Duke of Sussex has resigned from a charity that he set up to honour his late mother, following a row between the trustees and the chair of its board.
Prince Harry co-founded Sentebale in 2006 to help people in southern Africa living with HIV and Aids. In a statement this week, he announced that he was stepping down because the trustees' relationship with the chair "broke down beyond repair" after she was asked to resign and took legal action.
His exit is the latest chapter in a mixed history of ties between the royals and the charity sector.
What is the history of royals and charities? The first recorded patronage of a charity by a member of the royal family was George II's involvement with the Society of Antiquaries in the 18th century – a tie that continues to this day, with the Duke of Gloucester as the current royal patron.
More than 1,000 organisations now have a royal patron or president. The engagements and events they attend "draw in other well-connected donors and celebrities", Rob Cope, director of Remember A Charity, told the BBC. There's "no doubt" that royals "drive millions and millions of pounds" to the charity sector every year.
How are charities affected when royals go rogue? Lurid media allegations against royals can have knock-on effects for charities to which they are linked. When the Duchess of York was "all over the tabloids" in the early 1990s, the Motor Neurone Disease Association "considered breaking with her", Stephen Cook, editor of Third Sector magazine, told the BBC.
And when Prince Andrew faced a civil action in the US over sexual assault allegations, which he denied, he was stripped of all his charity patronages – a total of more than 200, including with the Royal Philharmonic Orchestra, the English National Ballet and the RNID.
Have there been other issues? Last year, King Charles and Prince William were accused of taking millions of pounds in rent, through their private estates, from organisations including cash-strapped charities.
A spokesperson said the Duchy of Cornwall was a "private estate with a commercial imperative". All the same, said The Observer's Catherine Bennett, how long will the British public "stomach sermons from royals made rich by their own charities"?
|