Don't use 'pants' for 'pantaloons': 19 surprising rules copy editors used to enforce

Newspapers often enshrine the pet peeves of one man... from the 19th century

Newspaper editor
(Image credit: (Jerry Cooke/Corbis))

Last week, a cherished usage distinction was killed in a shot heard round the copyediting world. During a session at the American Copy Editors Society, AP Stylebook editors announced that it would from now on be acceptable to use "over" for "more than" when referring to quantity.

In other words, according to AP rules, it's no longer incorrect to say, "over 500 editors fainted at the news." If you can't imagine how anyone could find that phrasing objectionable, you are not alone. "Over" has been used to mean "more than" for hundreds of years. But the insistence that "over" was only to be used for spatial and not numerical relationships had been a feature of American newspaper editorial standards since the 19th century, when William Cullen Bryant, editor of the New York Evening Post, compiled his Index Expurgatorius, a precursor to the modern style guide.

The Index Expurgatorius was basically a list of words that got on Bryant's nerves. He disapproved of the too casual "bogus" and "humbug," but also the too precious "residence" and "debut." Some of his directives passed into in-house style guides at other publications and became general newsroom habits, enshrining what was, in many cases, one man's opinion. Many of Bryant's guidelines have long since fallen away, as the over/more than distinction now has. Here are 19 rules from the Index Expurgatorius that no one would take a red pen to today:

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

1. Don't use "beat" for "defeat"

2. Don't use "call attention" for "direct attention"

3. Don't use "conclusion" for "close" or "end"

4. Don't use "decade" for "ten years"

5. Don't use "donate" at all

6. Don't use "collided" at all (it's now acceptable to use "collided," but only if both objects are in motion)

7. Don't use "fall" for "autumn"

8. Don't use "graduates" for "is graduated"

9. Don't use "hardly" for "scarcely"

10. Don't use "issue" for "question" or "subject"

11. Don't use "leniency" for "lenity"

12. Don't use "notice" for "observe"

13. Don't use "pants" for "pantaloons"

14. Don't use "prior to" for "before"

15. Don't use "progress" for "advance"

16. Don't use "reliable" for "trustworthy"

17. Don't use "retire" as an active verb

18. Don't use "sensation" for "noteworthy event"

19. Don't use "taboo" at all

To continue reading this article...
Continue reading this article and get limited website access each month.
Get unlimited website access, exclusive newsletters plus much more.
Cancel or pause at any time.
Already a subscriber to The Week?
Not sure which email you used for your subscription? Contact us
Arika Okrent

Arika Okrent is editor-at-large at TheWeek.com and a frequent contributor to Mental Floss. She is the author of In the Land of Invented Languages, a history of the attempt to build a better language. She holds a doctorate in linguistics and a first-level certification in Klingon. Follow her on Twitter.