The Fed's interest rate promise: 'Foolish'?

Ben Bernanke and Co. decide to keep banks' borrowing rate near zero until at least 2013. Will that really do anything to help the stuggling economy?

Traders on the New York Stock Exchange watch the market react to news that the Federal Reserve will keep its interest rates near zero.
(Image credit: Mario Tama/Getty Images)

On Tuesday, the Federal Reserve responded to weeks of poor economic news — and an increasingly volatile stock market (which crashed more than 600 points Monday, jumped more than 400 points Tuesday, and then cratered more than 400 points Wednesday morning) — by pledging to keep interest rates near zero through the middle of 2013. That interest rate, which affects the costs of banks lending money to each other, essentially extends current fiscal policy for at least two years. Some, however, argue that borrowing costs aren't the major impediment to an economic rebound in the first place. Is this plan "foolish" or wise?

Bernanke's announcement is inconsequential: This doesn't do "much to alter economic or financial conditions," says Unicredit economist Harm Bandholz, as quoted by The Wall Street Journal. Investors already assumed interest rates wouldn't rise until late 2012 or early 2013, so this isn't exactly a major gamechanger. If anything, this long-term promise just limits the Fed's flexibility and options when responding to fiscal twists and turns in the future.

"Economists react: Fed 'bunts' with timeframe for low rates"

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

This might help... but not enough: While the market had a strong finish Tuesday, "it's doubtful that the Fed's move will be enough to increase employment and growth," says The New York Times in an editorial. On top of that, three members of the Fed's own policy committee opposed keeping rates low into 2013, and that's "particularly disturbing." Such opposition could hamper further efforts by the Fed to aid the flailing economy. The committee needs to take aggressive action to stimulate the economy, not "focus on combating inflation at a time when the economy is clearly not overheating."

"Half-measures from the Fed"

Bernanke's interest rate promise is just the start: "An unprecedented number of dissenters vot[ed] against Bernanke's move," suggesting that "the mid-2013 language is just the start of what the chairman has up his sleeve and the inflation hawks want no part of it," says George Maniere at Benzinga. Expect Bernanke to make more major announcements later this month, and give "more details on what forms of stealth QE" — quantitative easing, a stimulative measure in which the Fed increases the supply of money in our economy — "he has in mind to support growth."

"Fed call wakes up global markets"

To continue reading this article...
Continue reading this article and get limited website access each month.
Get unlimited website access, exclusive newsletters plus much more.
Cancel or pause at any time.
Already a subscriber to The Week?
Not sure which email you used for your subscription? Contact us