Outcry over comments of judge set to decide if couple can continue having sex
Social services fear that the woman’s learning difficulties mean she can no longer consent to intercourse
A judge has sparked outrage with his comments about a case in which he will rule whether a man can continue to have sex with his wife of more than 20 years.
The Daily Telegraph reports that social workers assigned to the wife, who has learning difficulties, say there is “evidence that her mental health has reached a stage which means that she no longer has the capacity to make decisions about whether she wants to have sex”.
The Court of Protection - a specialist court in London that hears cases involving people who may lack the mental capacity to make legal decisions – has been asked to rule on the case.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Lawyers representing social service officials have suggested that the court might have to issue an order barring the man from having sex with his wife to “prevent her from being raped”. A full hearing is expected in the near future.
The judge overseeing the case, Justice Hayden, said he “wanted to examine evidence in detail” before making any decisions. The judge also expressed concern that the husband would face jail time if he violated any orders not to have sex with his wife, adding that such an order would be difficult to police.
“I cannot think of any more obviously fundamental human right than the right of a man to have sex with his wife - and the right of the State to monitor that,” Justice Hayden said. “I think he is entitled to have it properly argued.”
His choice of words have drawn strong criticism from activists, with Labour MP Thangam Debbonaire accusing the judge of “legitimising misogyny and woman-hatred”.
“No man in the UK has such a legal right to insist on sex,” she added in a tweet.
Fellow Labour MP Jess Phillips agrees, tweeting that someone having sex with their wife “is not even close to a right”, while journalist Eve Livingston calls Hayden’s comments “terrifying”.
Meanwhile, the Daily Mail notes that the “ability for a man to have sex with his wife without her consent was explicitly banned in 1991 and is punished by the courts as any other rape”.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Puppet shows, pagodas and pho: a guide to Hanoi
The Week Recommends Vietnam's capital city blends the ancient with the new
By Catherine Garcia, The Week US Published
-
'There are benefits, but not acknowledging them would tell only half of the story'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
What Trump's win could mean for Big Tech
Talking Points The tech industry is bracing itself for Trump's second administration
By Theara Coleman, The Week US Published
-
Texas’s abortion law: the Republicans get their way, at last
Speed Read SB8 authorises private citizens to sue anyone who performs, ‘aids or abets’ an abortion after six weeks of pregnancy
By The Week Staff Published
-
Changing legal gender: what’s new and how does it work?
Speed Read Cost of a gender recognition certificate application is reduced from £140 to £5
By Kate Samuelson Last updated
-
America’s bloodiest state votes to ban the death penalty
Speed Read Virginia has executed more than 1,300 people in its 400-year history
By Joe Evans Last updated
-
FBI accused of ‘fake’ background check on Donald Trump Supreme Court nominee
Speed Read Democratic senator calls for ‘proper oversight’ over Brett Kavanaugh investigation into sexual assault claims
By Joe Evans Last updated
-
Family of Malcolm X claims letter proves FBI and NYPD involved in his murder
Speed Read Daughters of assassinated civil rights leader demand reopening of investigation
By Joe Evans Last updated
-
Meghan Markle granted nine-month delay in Mail on Sunday privacy case
Speed Read Duchess of Sussex had applied for summary judgement in battle over letters sent to her estranged father
By Chas Newkey-Burden Last updated
-
Meghan Markle to pay £67,000 after losing first round of legal battle against Mail
Speed Read Duchess of Sussex is suing the newspaper’s publisher for printing parts of private letter to her father
By Joe Evans Published
-
MI6 agents tried to stop judge seeing secret documents in ‘licence to kill’ case
Speed Read Intelligence agency was forced to apologise for ‘any misunderstanding’, court documents show
By Joe Evans Published