What could Donald Trump’s tax returns reveal?
House Democrats target the president’s business dealings amid accusations they are starting a ‘witch hunt’

Donald Trump is facing a new assault on his presidency, after Democrats in Congress filed a request with the Inland Revenue Service for the last six years of his personal tax returns.
“The historic move, made official by House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Richard Neal on Wednesday, is all but certain to unleash a legal battle narrowing in on Trump's most guarded secrets that could drag on for months or even years while shaping the terrain of the 2020 election”, says CNN Stephen Collinson, and “opens a serious new political, legal, constitutional and personal front in the party's battle to use its new majority to check a defiant president”.
The billionaire property developer bucked nearly half a century’s tradition by refusing to release his tax returns during the 2016 campaign for the White House.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
This sparked widespread comment and stoked conspiracy theories as to why he would want them kept secret.
Last year it was revealed that authorities had begun investigating claims Trump took part in “dubious” tax schemes to disguise millions of dollars in gifts from their mother and father, Mary and Fred.
The state’s Department of Taxation and Finance said it was reviewing allegations by the New York Times (NYT) that the US president “received at least $413m [£318m] in today’s dollars from his father’s real estate empire, much of it through tax dodges in the 1990s”.
Those pushing for his tax returns to be made public say it is crucial to establish whether there is any conflict of interest between Trump’s official duties as president and his multiple business dealings.
Democratic Congressman Dan Kildee, said: “The president is the only person who can sign bills into law, and the public deserves to know whether the president’s personal financial interests affect his public decision making.”
Democrats are “concerned with the president’s compliance with federal tax laws,” The Guardian says, “as well as whether he or his family personally benefited from the tax overhaul passed by Republicans and signed by Trump in 2017”.
They “also believe Trump’s financial records could shed more light on his business dealings overseas and whether the president has violated the US constitution by receiving benefits from foreign countries without congressional approval,” the paper adds.
Yet the unprecedented and highly hostile move by the Democrats will also be seen by many supporters of the president as a political witch hunt, after the two-year battle to prove the Trump campaign colluded with Russia to win the 2016 election ended inconclusively.
Special Council Robert Mueller's failure to implicate Trump directly in a crime has prompted a furious backlash against House Democrats and the mainstream media, and both will be wary of going on the offensive over his tax returns for fear it could backfire politically.
In a sign of the divisions within the Democratic party, The New York Times reports that “liberal Democrats have complained for weeks that Neal, 70 and a roll-up-your-sleeves legislator, was dragging his feet on making the request”.
“They have organised events in his district, taken out advertisements and produced legal briefs meant to make a case that he should act and act quickly” reports the paper.
It follows recent internal battles between the progressive and moderate wings of the party, most notably over its handling of anti-Semitism and whether to continue to pursue obstruction of justice charges against Trump.
“Trump has offered multiple excuses for why he won’t release his tax returns, a norm his predecessors followed for 40 years” says Vox. One of the explanations he uses most often is that he is under audit by the IRS, “but being under audit does not preclude Trump from releasing his tax returns — he could go ahead and release them anyway” adds the news site.
There could be a prosaic reason behind the president’s refusal to reveal his financial holdings, however. For a man who has built his reputation on an image of wealth and success, a revelation he is not worth as much as he says could be hugely embarrassing and even impact his standing with the American public.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
5 unusually elusive cartoons about the Epstein files
Cartoons Artists take on Pam Bondi's vanishing desk, the Mar-a-Lago bathrooms, and more
-
Lemon and courgette carbonara recipe
The Week Recommends Zingy and fresh, this pasta is a summer treat
-
Corbynism returns: a new party on the Left
Talking Point Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana's breakaway progressive party has already got off to a shaky start
-
Trump uses tariffs to upend Brazil's domestic politics
IN THE SPOTLIGHT By slapping a 50% tariff on Brazil for its criminal investigation into Bolsonaro, the Trump administration is brazenly putting its fingers on the scales of a key foreign election
-
'Trump's authoritarian manipulation of language'
Instant Opinion Vienna has become a 'convenient target for populists' | Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Trump set to hit Canada with 35% tariffs
Speed Read The president accused Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney of failing to stop the cross-border flow of fentanyl
-
Could Trump really 'take over' American cities?
Today's Big Question Trump has proposed a federal takeover of New York City and Washington, D.C.
-
Trump threatens Brazil with 50% tariffs
Speed Read He accused Brazil's current president of leading a 'witch hunt' against far-right former leader Jair Bolsonaro
-
Is the Trump-Putin bromance over... again?
Today's Big Question The US president has admitted he's 'p*ssed off' with his opposite number
-
SCOTUS greenlights Trump's federal firings
speed read The Trump administration can conduct mass federal firings without Congress' permission, the Supreme Court ruled
-
'The way AI is discussed makes it seem like this is a necessary outcome'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day