Government ministers set up a VIP channel that allowed firms with political connections to pocket billions of pounds of taxpayer’s money during the Covid-19 response, a report has revealed.
The National Audit Office (NAO) report found that “suppliers with links to politicians were ten times more likely to be awarded contracts than those who applied to the Department of Health”, The Times reports.
The “damning” report adds that in some cases “due diligence checks were not carried out until weeks after contracts had been awarded”, adding to rising allegations of “cronyism” in the handing out of big money contracts, the paper adds.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Almost 500 companies with links to politicians or government officials were referred to the fast-track channel, meaning “their pitches for contracts were automatically treated as credible by government officials charged with procuring PPE”, The Guardian says.
The use of a VIP route to securing government contracts is a “highly unusual departure from standard procurement practice”, the paper adds.
It was only revealed by the NAO in a report showing that the UK government awarded £18bn of coronavirus–related contracts during the first six months of the pandemic. More than half (£10.5bn) of contracts relating to the pandemic were awarded without competitive tender, according to the NAO.
Officials paid out more than £5m in consultancy fees to companies with ties to ministers and the Conservative party, including signing off on a £1.5m deal with two New Zealand social media consultants who worked on Boris Johnson’s election campaign.
The NAO also drew attention to a pest control company, Pestfix, “that was mistakenly put in the high-priority route” resulting in a £350m contract for the delivery of 600,000 masks “that did not meet the standards for hospital use”, The Times says.
Labour MP Meg Hillier, chairperson of the public accounts committee, said the report showed the government had “ridden roughshod over the taxpayer... ripping up too many of the rules that guard against cronyism”.
Julia Lopez, Cabinet Office minister, said: “We have robust processes to ensure we get critical equipment, while also ensuring value for money for the taxpayer.”
Hall of shame
Ayanda Capital, received a £253m order for 50 million masks which could not be used by NHS workers, while Sabia Mokeddem, a 23-year-old financial trader, was given £880,000 to supply 55,000 coveralls.
Public First, a company run by two former Michael Gove aides, received a contract for a maximum of £840,000, of which £550,000 was invoiced. Faculty, an artificial intelligence firm that worked for Dominic Cummings on the Vote Leave campaign, was handed three contracts worth almost £3m.
Management consultancy firm Deloitte won a contract for delivering PPE to frontline workers worth £3.2m. It has since “come under fire over shortcomings in delivery”, The Times reports.
-
What are the best investments for beginners?The Explainer Stocks and ETFs and bonds, oh my
-
What to know before filing your own taxes for the first timethe explainer Tackle this financial milestone with confidence
-
The biggest box office flops of the 21st centuryin depth Unnecessary remakes and turgid, expensive CGI-fests highlight this list of these most notorious box-office losers
-
How corrupt is the UK?The Explainer Decline in standards ‘risks becoming a defining feature of our political culture’ as Britain falls to lowest ever score on global index
-
The Mandelson files: Labour Svengali’s parting gift to StarmerThe Explainer Texts and emails about Mandelson’s appointment as US ambassador could fuel biggest political scandal ‘for a generation’
-
Three consequences from the Jenrick defectionThe Explainer Both Kemi Badenoch and Nigel Farage may claim victory, but Jenrick’s move has ‘all-but ended the chances of any deal to unite the British right’
-
The high street: Britain’s next political battleground?In the Spotlight Mass closure of shops and influx of organised crime are fuelling voter anger, and offer an opening for Reform UK
-
The MAGA civil war takes center stage at the Turning Point USA conferenceIN THE SPOTLIGHT ‘Americafest 2025’ was a who’s who of right-wing heavyweights eager to settle scores and lay claim to the future of MAGA
-
Is a Reform-Tory pact becoming more likely?Today’s Big Question Nigel Farage’s party is ahead in the polls but still falls well short of a Commons majority, while Conservatives are still losing MPs to Reform
-
What does the fall in net migration mean for the UK?Today’s Big Question With Labour and the Tories trying to ‘claim credit’ for lower figures, the ‘underlying picture is far less clear-cut’
-
Asylum hotels: everything you need to knowThe Explainer Using hotels to house asylum seekers has proved extremely unpopular. Why, and what can the government do about it?
