The "Big Lie" is on the ballot in this year's midterm elections. In a number of states, Republicans are running candidates who support the false notion that Donald Trump was the real winner of the 2020 presidential election. And a number of those candidates are running to become the top elections official in their respective states. If they win, the rules under which American elections are contested could change radically before the next presidential campaign.
"Would-be secretaries cannot unilaterally rewrite state election law on their own," Zach Montellaro points out at Politico. But "there are opportunities for election deniers to remake their state's election procedures in their image."
Who are these pro-Trump Republicans who want to run their states' elections, and how could they upend the 2024 campaign? Here's everything you need to know:
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Who are these candidates, anyway?
"In at least 11 states, the Republican nominee for the job of overseeing future elections is someone who has questioned, rejected, or tried to overturn the results of the 2020 election," CNN reports. That includes GOP candidates in three swing states: Mark Finchem of Arizona, Kristina Karamo of Michigan, and Jim Marchant of Nevada. But it doesn't include another swing state, Pennsylvania, where the governor appoints the top election official — and where Doug Mastriano, who chartered buses to the Capitol on Jan. 6, is the Republican nominee for the top job.
Together, some of these candidates have formed the America First Secretary of State Coalition, a group that "shares conspiracy theories about unfounded election fraud and exchanges ideas on how radically to reconstruct election systems" The Guardian reports.
Perhaps the most infamous of the candidates is Finchem, in Arizona, another Republican candidate who was close to the Capitol on Jan. 6 and has ties to the QAnon movement. He hasn't won the office, but he's already disrupting this year's election — along with Kari Lake, the GOP nominee for governor, he sued and lost to force Arizona officials to hand-count ballots in this November's election instead of using machines. Trump lost Arizona in 2020, of course, but the New York Times reports that in May, Finchem sent an email to supporters saying that if he'd held the state elections post in 2020, "we would have won. Plain and simple."
How might they actually affect elections in their states?
Rick Hasen, director of the Safeguarding Democracy Project at UCLA, says the election-denying candidates raise two questions: "One: Are they going to administer elections fairly?" he told NPR. "And two: Even if they do, are others going to believe that they administer elections fairly?"
But these candidates could do more than give voters bad vibes. "More than any other category of elected official, secretaries of state could be instrumental in overturning the popular vote in their state — an unprecedented move in American history — or take other actions that throw results into question," Amber Phillips writes at The Washington Post.
How could they do that? "Atop the list of the most disruptive things they could do is refusing to certify accurate election results," Montellaro writes at Politico. Just as importantly, "many of the candidates want to dramatically change the rules for future elections, too." One common thread among the election-denying Republicans is a desire to roll back access to mail voting and ballot drop boxes in favor of same-day in-person voting.
That's the mild stuff: "Perhaps the most radical proposal from some of the candidates would be to completely scrap their states' voter rolls, requiring people to re-register." That could potentially make thousands and thousands of would-be voters ineligible to cast ballots if they don't get re-registered.
Are voters paying attention?
Let's face it: In most states, the races for secretary of state aren't usually all that sexy. Can you even name the top elections official in your state?
Still, it's clear that some political and media observers are trying to sound the alarm about the possibility of election deniers taking over state election systems, and unprecedented amounts of money are now pouring into those campaigns. "The stakes are really high but I also think people understand what's at stake and that's why you're seeing this level of enthusiasm," Colorado's secretary of state, Jena Griswold, said in an interview with The Guardian. "We must reject that it is partisan to protect the right to vote. It's not," she said. "It's the most American and democratic thing you can do."
Until the last few years, most elections officials did their jobs in relative anonymity. Those days seem to be over. "Trump is continuing to make election fraud the centerpiece of his effort to return to the presidency," Louis Jacobson blogs for UVA's Center for Politics. "This makes the outcome of the 27 secretary of state races in 2022 more important than ever."
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.