Former Prime Minister Tony Blair has urged the government not to rule out sending ground troops to Iraq and Syria to fight against Islamic State militants.
Blair, whose tenure as PM was defined by the Iraq invasion in 2003, said that while Western leaders had "no appetite for ground engagement", it might be necessary to defeat the terrorist organisation. He also said people should "appreciate" the lessons he had learnt by going to war in Iraq.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
His views were echoed by Lieutenant General Sir Graeme Lamb, a former director of British special forces, who said it is now time for the government to "rule in" the idea of British boots on the ground in Iraq, the Daily Telegraph reports.
In an essay published on the Tony Blair Faith Foundation website, the former Labour leader outlines points that he believes should underpin the UK's policy towards religious extremism in the Middle East.
"There can be an abundance of diplomacy, all necessary relief of humanitarian suffering, every conceivable statement of condemnation which we can muster," writes Blair, "but unless they're accompanied by physical combat, we will mitigate the problem but not overcome it."
Blair's statement comes just days after Barack Obama's chief military advisor said US troops could return to Iraq.
While the UK remains committed to arming Kurdish forces as well as delivering humanitarian aid and has not ruled out joining US air strikes, David Cameron, like Obama, has made it clear that he does not want to get involved in another ground war in the country.
On Wednesday, Cameron will attend a UN Security Council meeting in New York, where he is expected to outline details of Britain's contribution to the fight against Islamic State.
-
The murky role of military contractors in warThe Explainer A civil case against US company has revived debate over the increasing use of private security firms in military operations
-
Labour and nuclear weapons: a turbulent ideological historyThe Explainer From the 1940s to Keir Starmer, the party leadership has zigzagged in and out of love with the bomb
-
Why is Islamic State targeting Russia?Today's Big Question Islamist terror group's attack on 'soft target' in Moscow was driven in part by 'opportunity and personnel'
-
The deadly attacks on Syrian truffle huntersfeature Islamic State suspected of targeting Syrians risking their lives to secure much-needed income
-
Can the UK rely on the British Army to defend itself?Today's Big Question Armed forces in ‘dire state’ and no longer regarded as top-level fighting force, US general warns
-
Is Henry Kissinger right about Ukraine?Speed Read The US statesman made a controversial speech at a virtual Davos appearance last week
-
Volodymyr Zelenskyy refused evacuation as Russian hitmen ‘parachuted’ into KyivSpeed Read Ukrainian president turned down opportunity to leave capital despite threat to life, adviser claims
-
America’s withdrawal from Afghanistan: a retreat into isolationism?Speed Read ‘In his selfish unilateralism’, Biden is no better than Trump, said The Daily Telegraph
