Much has been written about the wide-ranging influence of music legend David Bowie following the shock news of his death yesterday.
But alongside the artists telling how they were inspired by his musical, artistic and aesthetic innovations, the business pages also paid tribute to his legacy – the "Bowie bond".
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
In simple terms, Bowie sold the rights to future revenues from the 25 studio albums he had recorded before 1990. Financial institution Prudential Financial paid $55m to secure the bonds, which paid a fixed return of 7.9 per cent each year, backed by royalties from the singer's back catalogue.
Some questioned why Bowie would want to sell the rights to sales of albums including The Rise and Fall of Ziggy Stardust and the Spiders from Mars, Aladdin Sane, Scary Monsters (and Super Creeps) and Let’s Dance.
"Rather than getting steady income from the revenues of his back catalogue... the bonds allowed Bowie to borrow more money up front," the Financial Times notes.
Alongside the cash boost, the BBC cites claims from music writer Paul Trynka that the singer used around half the proceeds to buy the 50 per cent of the rights to his legacy collection that he did not already own from his former manager, Tony DeFries.
The pioneering bonds opened the door to a whole new world of possibilities in the nascent asset-backed securities sector. David Pullman, the banker behind the deal, went on to similarly securitise the music rights to work by James Brown, Marvin Gaye and The Isley Brothers.
While the bonds are deemed to have performed well, they did eventually run out of steam in the early 2000s as the launch of online platforms offering music-streaming and downloads undermined album sales. In 2004, ratings agency Moody's downgraded the bonds to one notch above "junk" status.
Bowie himself predicted the huge shake-up the internet would bring to the business model for music artists and labels.
"The absolute transformation of everything that we ever thought about music will take place within ten years and nothing is going to be able to stop it," he told the New York Times in 2002. "I'm fully confident that copyright, for instance, will no longer exist in ten years and authorship and intellectual property is in for such a bashing."
-
Labour shortages: the ‘most urgent problem’ facing the UK economy right nowSpeed Read Britain is currently in the grip of an ‘employment crisis’
-
Will the energy war hurt Europe more than Russia?Speed Read European Commission proposes a total ban on Russian oil
-
Will Elon Musk manage to take over Twitter?Speed Read The world’s richest man has launched a hostile takeover bid worth $43bn
-
Shoppers urged not to buy into dodgy Black Friday dealsSpeed Read Consumer watchdog says better prices can be had on most of the so-called bargain offers
-
Ryanair: readying for departure from LondonSpeed Read Plans to delist Ryanair from the London Stock Exchange could spell ‘another blow’ to the ‘dwindling’ London market
-
Out of fashion: Asos ‘curse’ has struck againSpeed Read Share price tumbles following the departure of CEO Nick Beighton
-
Universal Music’s blockbuster listing: don’t stop me now…Speed Read Investors are betting heavily that the ‘boom in music streaming’, which has transformed Universal’s fortunes, ‘still has a long way to go’
-
EasyJet/Wizz: battle for air supremacySpeed Read ‘Wizz’s cheeky takeover bid will have come as a blow to the corporate ego’
