Donald Trump has launched a bid to return US astronauts to the Moon, followed by missions to Mars and beyond.
The US president signed a new national space policy directive earlier this month that paves the way for a Nasa-led programme of manned exploration, with support from private sector partners. But no human has set foot on the Moon in 45 years, and the Apollo space programme appeared to be winding down - leading to questions about exactly how Trump plans to leave America’s footprint on the Moon, and when.
“His official directive to Nasa did not set a target date, or outline any new programmes that would be needed to put people back on the lunar surface,” the Financial Times notes.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
So is Trump “dreaming big”, as he says, or simply dreaming?
Trump told a rally near Nasa’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida last year that he would “free Nasa from the restriction of serving primarily as a logistical agency for low Earth-orbit activities” and enable it to “instead refocus on space exploration”, CNN says.
“Under a Trump administration, Florida and America will lead the way into the stars,” Trump added.
Vice President Mike Pence is leading the recently revived National Space Council, an executive group that will guide the US space agenda, with a focus on enhanced national security, innovation and job creation.
But how will the government-private partnership work?
The commercial vision
Amazon’s chief executive Jeff Bezos is pitching to set up Amazon-like delivery for future human settlement of the Moon.
“It is time for America to return to the Moon - this time to stay,” Bezos said in response to emailed questions from The Washington Post (which he owns). “A permanently inhabited lunar settlement is a difficult and worthy objective. I sense a lot of people are excited about this.”
Space entrepreneur Elon Musk envisions building a rocket to reach Mars, saying it could be used to support a manned lunar base on the planet and to ferry people to different locations on Earth at high speed.
A third company, Moon Express, hopes to put an unmanned vehicle on the Moon and then establish a base there for mining, the FT reports.
“The Moon offers a good testing ground for trying out technologies that could be useful for keeping humans alive on Mars, such as habitats,” the company claims, according to a report by The Verge.
Does Nasa have the budget?
There were calls for Nasa to return to the Moon during both Bush presidencies, but little progress was made.
The Verge says that Nasa lacks the funding to turn dreams of a Moon mission into reality.
“Nasa’s human exploration programmes suck up $4bn each year, and there’s little money left over for other programmes,” Phil Larson, a former space advisor for the Obama administration, told the news site. “The Moon is great, but the plans and partnerships matter more than dates and destination.”
Without plans for additional funding, “these dreams will simply evaporate, as they have so many times before”, adds Forbes. “Like all plans, to bring this one to fruition will require a tremendous investment of resources: in people, in equipment and facilities, in research and development, and in terms of money as well.”
Continue reading for free
We hope you're enjoying The Week's refreshingly open-minded journalism.
Subscribed to The Week? Register your account with the same email as your subscription.