The political map of Britain may soon be redrawn, following the publication of the final recommendations for new parliamentary boundaries.
If approved, the proposal from the independent Boundary Commission would see the number of MPs reduced from 650 to 600 and make constituencies more equal in size.
The changes would trigger a major shake-up in seats, with some disappearing altogether, including Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn’s Islington North seat in London.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The Labour Party has accused the Conservatives of orchestrating an “undemocratic power grab”, but the Government insists the current boundaries, decided by population figures, are out of date.
So what difference would the proposed changes make and which parties have the most to lose?
Why are boundaries changing?
Under UK law, the size and shape of parliamentary boundaries must be periodically reviewed in order to keep up with changes in population size.
The Government says the changes are long overdue, with large variations in the number of voters in different seats that puts the Tories at a disadvantage.
The changes were “meant to happen while the coalition government was in power between 2010 to 2015”, but the plan was abandoned in 2013 after the Lib Dems withdrew their support, reports the BBC.
What difference will it make?
Under the latest proposals, the number of constituencies would be cut from 650 to 600, and constituencies would contain between 71,031 and 78,507 voters each.
As well as Corbyn’s Islington North seat, former Brexit secretary David Davis would also see his Haltemprice and Howden seat disappear.
Political analysts agree that the planned changes are likely to benefit the Conservatives the most, while putting Labour at a disadvantage.
Under the new system, the hung parliament of the 2017 election would probably have resulted in a safe Conservative majority, says The Guardian’s Peter Walker.
However, some big-name Tories, including former foreign secretary Boris Johnson, “could face a tougher battle due to changes to the composition of their seats”, the BBC reports.
Will the shake-up go ahead?
The proposals will need the backing of MPs and peers, but according to Sky News election analyst Michael Thrasher, winning Commons approval for the changes is likely to prove tricky.
Labour, the Liberal Democrats, the Scottish National Party (SNP) and Plaid Cymru are all against the proposals, meaning the Conservatives will have to rely on their Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) bedfellows, Thrasher says.
“Previously, this was thought unlikely, but the final report may be slightly better for the DUP,” he continues, but adds that the vote “may become more complicated still if individual MPs defy their party whips”.
-
What role will Trump play in the battle over Warner Bros. Discovery?Today’s Big Question Netflix and Paramount fight for the president’s approval
-
‘The menu’s other highlights smack of the surreal’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Education: More Americans say college isn’t worth itfeature College is costly and job prospects are vanishing
-
Is a Reform-Tory pact becoming more likely?Today’s Big Question Nigel Farage’s party is ahead in the polls but still falls well short of a Commons majority, while Conservatives are still losing MPs to Reform
-
The launch of Your Party: how it could workThe Explainer Despite landmark decisions made over the party’s makeup at their first conference, core frustrations are ‘likely to only intensify in the near-future’
-
What does the fall in net migration mean for the UK?Today’s Big Question With Labour and the Tories trying to ‘claim credit’ for lower figures, the ‘underlying picture is far less clear-cut’
-
Asylum hotels: everything you need to knowThe Explainer Using hotels to house asylum seekers has proved extremely unpopular. Why, and what can the government do about it?
-
Will the public buy Rachel Reeves’s tax rises?Today’s Big Question The Chancellor refused to rule out tax increases in her televised address, and is set to reverse pledges made in the election manifesto
-
Five takeaways from Plaid Cymru’s historic Caerphilly by-election winThe Explainer The ‘big beasts’ were ‘humbled’ but there was disappointment for second-placed Reform too
-
The Chinese threat: No. 10’s evidence leads to more questionsTalking Point Keir Starmer is under pressure after collapsed spying trial
-
The new age of book banningThe Explainer How America’s culture wars collided with parents and legislators who want to keep their kids away from ‘dangerous’ ideas
