Constituency boundary shake-up: everything you need to know
Labour says plans to slash Britain’s 650 MPs to 600 are part of Tory ‘power grab’
The political map of Britain may soon be redrawn, following the publication of the final recommendations for new parliamentary boundaries.
If approved, the proposal from the independent Boundary Commission would see the number of MPs reduced from 650 to 600 and make constituencies more equal in size.
The changes would trigger a major shake-up in seats, with some disappearing altogether, including Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn’s Islington North seat in London.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The Labour Party has accused the Conservatives of orchestrating an “undemocratic power grab”, but the Government insists the current boundaries, decided by population figures, are out of date.
So what difference would the proposed changes make and which parties have the most to lose?
Why are boundaries changing?
Under UK law, the size and shape of parliamentary boundaries must be periodically reviewed in order to keep up with changes in population size.
The Government says the changes are long overdue, with large variations in the number of voters in different seats that puts the Tories at a disadvantage.
The changes were “meant to happen while the coalition government was in power between 2010 to 2015”, but the plan was abandoned in 2013 after the Lib Dems withdrew their support, reports the BBC.
What difference will it make?
Under the latest proposals, the number of constituencies would be cut from 650 to 600, and constituencies would contain between 71,031 and 78,507 voters each.
As well as Corbyn’s Islington North seat, former Brexit secretary David Davis would also see his Haltemprice and Howden seat disappear.
Political analysts agree that the planned changes are likely to benefit the Conservatives the most, while putting Labour at a disadvantage.
Under the new system, the hung parliament of the 2017 election would probably have resulted in a safe Conservative majority, says The Guardian’s Peter Walker.
However, some big-name Tories, including former foreign secretary Boris Johnson, “could face a tougher battle due to changes to the composition of their seats”, the BBC reports.
Will the shake-up go ahead?
The proposals will need the backing of MPs and peers, but according to Sky News election analyst Michael Thrasher, winning Commons approval for the changes is likely to prove tricky.
Labour, the Liberal Democrats, the Scottish National Party (SNP) and Plaid Cymru are all against the proposals, meaning the Conservatives will have to rely on their Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) bedfellows, Thrasher says.
“Previously, this was thought unlikely, but the final report may be slightly better for the DUP,” he continues, but adds that the vote “may become more complicated still if individual MPs defy their party whips”.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
The week's best photos
In Pictures Firing shells, burning ballots, and more
By Anahi Valenzuela, The Week US Published
-
The Great Mughals: a 'treasure trove' of an exhibition
The Week Recommends The V&A's new show is 'spell-binding'
By The Week UK Published
-
Damian Barr shares his favourite books
The Week Recommends The writer and broadcaster picks works by Alice Walker, Elif Shafak and others
By The Week UK Published
-
John Prescott: was he Labour's last link to the working class?
Today's Big Quesiton 'A total one-off': tributes have poured in for the former deputy PM and trade unionist
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Last hopes for justice for UK's nuclear test veterans
Under the Radar Thousands of ex-service personnel say their lives have been blighted by aggressive cancers and genetic mutations
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Donald Trump wreck the Brexit deal?
Today's Big Question President-elect's victory could help UK's reset with the EU, but a free-trade agreement with the US to dodge his threatened tariffs could hinder it
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
What is the next Tory leader up against?
Today's Big Question Kemi Badenoch or Robert Jenrick will have to unify warring factions and win back disillusioned voters – without alienating the centre ground
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Labour risking the 'special relationship'?
Today's Big Question Keir Starmer forced to deny Donald Trump's formal complaint that Labour staffers are 'interfering' to help Harris campaign
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
What is Lammy hoping to achieve in China?
Today's Big Question Foreign secretary heads to Beijing as Labour seeks cooperation on global challenges and courts opportunities for trade and investment
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Men in Gray suits: why the plots against Starmer's top adviser?
Today's Big Question Increasingly damaging leaks about Sue Gray reflect 'bitter acrimony' over her role and power struggle in new government
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Who will replace Rishi Sunak as the next Tory leader?
In Depth Shortlist will be whittled down to two later today
By The Week UK Last updated