Did the Fed's bond buying work?

Everything you need to know, in three paragraphs

Janet Yellen
(Image credit: (Alex Wong/Getty Images))

"Future historians will wince when they examine" the grand economic experiment that recently ended, said Liam Halligan at The Daily Telegraph (U.K.). The Federal Reserve has finally called time on its immense bond-buying program, better known as quantitative easing, or QE. Originally billed as a $600 billion emergency measure to prop up the failing housing market in the darkest days of 2008, QE ballooned into a six-year, $4 trillion spending spree on U.S. Treasuries and mortgage-backed securities, aimed at invigorating a weak economic recovery by pumping ever more money into the financial system. In the end, the winners were Wall Street banks, which were able to mask "the true state of their rancid balance sheets" as they were repeatedly "hosed down" with trillions of dollars created out of thin air. Even as Wall Street raked it in, 99.5 percent of us "got nothing," said Jonathon Trugman at the New York Post. The Fed hoped that historically low interest rates would spur consumers and businesses to borrow and spend more. But banks refused to lend and instead accumulated vast reserves and posted handsome profits, all with the aid of the Fed's unprecedented money machine.

"QE may not have been the perfect policy solution," said Jill Schlesinger at the Chicago Tribune, but "doing nothing would have been far worse." The first two rounds of QE in 2008 and 2010 probably increased economic output almost 3 percent and helped add more than 2 million jobs, in part by boosting confidence in banks and in the economy. After the third round was launched in 2012, we avoided a potential recession in 2013 and watched as unemployment recently fell to 5.9 percent, all while the stock market soared and inflation remained tame. Sure, "savers have taken it on the chin" in the face of zero-percent interest rates, but they are still better off than they would have been "if the economy were stuck in an even lower gear." The Fed "did the right thing" given the extraordinary circumstances, said BloombergView in an editorial. Faced with the threat of "great and lasting economic damage," the central bank accurately gauged that "the risks of QE were small in relation to the possible gains." And perhaps just as important is that we now know the Fed is "willing to do everything in its power to revive the economy."

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up
To continue reading this article...
Continue reading this article and get limited website access each month.
Get unlimited website access, exclusive newsletters plus much more.
Cancel or pause at any time.
Already a subscriber to The Week?
Not sure which email you used for your subscription? Contact us

Sergio Hernandez is business editor of The Week's print edition. He has previously worked for The DailyProPublica, the Village Voice, and Gawker.