Wall Street is abuzz over high-frequency trading, said Matthew Philips in Businessweek.com. Ever since Michael Lewis went on 60 Minutes to promote his new book, Flash Boys, and “accuse high-frequency traders of rigging the stock market,” the debate “over HFT’s merits and evils” has been hard to avoid. But all the chatter clouds the big issue: Is high-frequency trading in fact insider trading? Critics say yes, since the practice allows those traders to “get better information faster than the rest of the market”—often by nanoseconds—thanks to tactics such as physically placing their computer servers closer to exchanges or paying exchanges for proprietary data feeds. This is legal because, by law, prices must be entered into the exchanges’ public data feed (called the securities information processor, or SIP) and the proprietary feeds at the same time. “But once data leaves the exchanges, the proprietary systems often process and transmit the information faster,” giving added leverage to high-speed traders.
The government, apparently, thinks this is unfair, said Charles Gasparino in the New York Post. The U.S. attorney in New York, the FBI, and the Securities and Exchange Commission are all investigating high-frequency traders, on the suspicion that they rip off individual investors by eclipsing their orders “at the speed of light,” thereby forcing them to pay more for stocks than they would have “if the high-speed computer never existed.” But the only orders HFTs are cutting the line on are for the big Wall Street firms. Until high-speed trading came along, money managers and their clients at places like Blackrock “could hide their orders, and trade without alerting the rest of the markets.” High-speed trading has made the system more transparent, and “any rip-off here is of the rich, by the rich.” For the average investor, “whatever game they’re playing might be a net plus,” since HFTs have lowered trading costs for everyone in the market.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
-
Issue of the week: How Yellen spooked the marketsfeature At her first press conference, the new Federal Reserve chair made the mistake of indicating when the Fed would raise interest rates.
-
Stop calling women ‘bossy’
feature Let’s ban “She’s bossy.” Instead, let’s try, “She has executive leadership skills.”
-
Issue of the week: GM’s recall disaster
feature Mary Barra is facing “her first big test” since she took over as GM’s new CEO in January: a recall of more than 1.6 million vehicles.
-
Issue of the week: Who gets Fannie’s and Freddie’s profits?
feature Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s shareholders want their money back.
-
Issue of the week: Comcast buying Time Warner Cable
feature Has Comcast won the cable wars?
-
Issue of the week: AOL’s million-dollar babies
feature AOL’s “gaffe-prone” CEO, Tim Armstrong, “got in some hot water” last week.
-
Issue of the week: Why Google unloaded Motorola
feature Three years after shelling out $12.5 billion for Motorola, Google announced its sale to Lenovo Group for $2.9 billion.
-
Issue of the week: Why was hiring so slow in December?
feature A very disappointing jobs report for December douses a budding era of good feeling with “a great deal of uncertainty.”