Don't use 'pants' for 'pantaloons': 19 surprising rules copy editors used to enforce
Newspapers often enshrine the pet peeves of one man... from the 19th century
Last week, a cherished usage distinction was killed in a shot heard round the copyediting world. During a session at the American Copy Editors Society, AP Stylebook editors announced that it would from now on be acceptable to use "over" for "more than" when referring to quantity.
In other words, according to AP rules, it's no longer incorrect to say, "over 500 editors fainted at the news." If you can't imagine how anyone could find that phrasing objectionable, you are not alone. "Over" has been used to mean "more than" for hundreds of years. But the insistence that "over" was only to be used for spatial and not numerical relationships had been a feature of American newspaper editorial standards since the 19th century, when William Cullen Bryant, editor of the New York Evening Post, compiled his Index Expurgatorius, a precursor to the modern style guide.
The Index Expurgatorius was basically a list of words that got on Bryant's nerves. He disapproved of the too casual "bogus" and "humbug," but also the too precious "residence" and "debut." Some of his directives passed into in-house style guides at other publications and became general newsroom habits, enshrining what was, in many cases, one man's opinion. Many of Bryant's guidelines have long since fallen away, as the over/more than distinction now has. Here are 19 rules from the Index Expurgatorius that no one would take a red pen to today:
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
1. Don't use "beat" for "defeat"
2. Don't use "call attention" for "direct attention"
3. Don't use "conclusion" for "close" or "end"
4. Don't use "decade" for "ten years"
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
5. Don't use "donate" at all
6. Don't use "collided" at all (it's now acceptable to use "collided," but only if both objects are in motion)
7. Don't use "fall" for "autumn"
8. Don't use "graduates" for "is graduated"
9. Don't use "hardly" for "scarcely"
10. Don't use "issue" for "question" or "subject"
11. Don't use "leniency" for "lenity"
12. Don't use "notice" for "observe"
13. Don't use "pants" for "pantaloons"
14. Don't use "prior to" for "before"
15. Don't use "progress" for "advance"
16. Don't use "reliable" for "trustworthy"
17. Don't use "retire" as an active verb
18. Don't use "sensation" for "noteworthy event"
19. Don't use "taboo" at all
Arika Okrent is editor-at-large at TheWeek.com and a frequent contributor to Mental Floss. She is the author of In the Land of Invented Languages, a history of the attempt to build a better language. She holds a doctorate in linguistics and a first-level certification in Klingon. Follow her on Twitter.
-
Today's political cartoons - November 17, 2024
Cartoons Sunday's cartoons - Trump turkey, melting media, and more
By The Week US Published
-
5 contentious cartoons about Matt Gaetz's AG nomination
Cartoons Artists take on ethical uncertainty, offensive justice, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Funeral in Berlin: Scholz pulls the plug on his coalition
Talking Point In the midst of Germany's economic crisis, the 'traffic-light' coalition comes to a 'ignoble end'
By The Week UK Published