John Boehner's new debt ceiling offer: It's a trap
Boehner asks for a six-week punt on the debt ceiling — and on confronting his party's base


Ten days into the government shutdown, and with the deadline to raise the debt ceiling one week away, House Republicans say they are ready to make a deal — sort of.
Under the latest plan, Speaker Boehner (R-Ohio) and company are proposing a six-week hike in the debt ceiling in exchange for the promise of future budget negotiations. In a press conference Thursday morning, Boehner called the proposal a "good faith effort on our part to move halfway to what [President Obama] has demanded."
Except the supposed olive branch does not involve a temporary funding measure, known as a continuing resolution, that would reopen the government.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The White House is reportedly open to the idea of a short-term debt ceiling fix — but only if the GOP first agrees to reopen the government, no strings attached. "Once Republicans in Congress act to remove the threat of default and end this harmful government shutdown the president will be willing to negotiate on a broader budget agreement," a White House official said in a statement.
It's pretty clear why Boehner split the debt ceiling from the shutdown. Here's Jonathan Chait at New York:
Business is freaked out and will be furious with him if he triggers a default. So he’s raising the debt ceiling for long enough to get them off his back. And Tea Partiers will be furious if he abandons their quest to defund ObamaCare by shutting down the government. So he’s leaving that part in place. [New York]
While Obama could be tempted to win a six-week reprieve from the threat of an economic meltdown, Republicans in the House reportedly see Boehner's move as a way to maximize concessions from the president. "The decision is not about giving ground but simply delaying one fight to dig in on the other," says Jonathan Strong at National Review. Tea Partiers "want to achieve an ObamaCare victory on the CR and then an entitlement-reform victory on the debt ceiling."
In short, Republicans are not tearing up their ransom note, but rather asking for more time to write a new one. The White House does not want to "proceed with both the closed government and a future debt limit hike giving Republicans leverage," says Greg Sargent at The Washington Post.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Which brings us back to where we started. Tea Party conservatives want nothing short of fantastical victories, like the dismantling of Obama's signature domestic policy achievement. Democrats will never pay such a massive ransom. As National Review's Robert Costa writes:
Unless Boehner is finally willing to deal with Democrats at the expense of the Tea Party, there is no reason to believe the supposed breakthrough will do anything more than stave off a catastrophic default for six more weeks.
Jon Terbush is an associate editor at TheWeek.com covering politics, sports, and other things he finds interesting. He has previously written for Talking Points Memo, Raw Story, and Business Insider.
-
Democrats: How to rebuild a damaged brand
Feature Trump's approval rating is sinking, but so is the Democratic brand
-
Unraveling autism
Feature RFK Jr. has vowed to find the root cause of the 'autism epidemic' in months. Scientists have doubts.
-
'Two dolls': Can Trump sell Americans on austerity?
Feature Trump's tariffs may be threatening holiday shelves but they've handed Democrats a 'huge gift'
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy