Feature

Why people hate feminists, environmentalists, and activists in general

A new study offers insight into why so many of us are unmoved by their grating do-good ways

Can't stand man-hating feminists and hippie environmentalists? You're not the only one.

A new study from the University of Toronto published in the European Journal of Social Psychology shows that feminists, environmentalists, and activists in general may face an uphill battle gaining supporters because no one wants to be associated with their irritating do-gooder ways.

"Unfortunately, the very nature of activism leads to negative stereotyping," the researchers conclude from a series of experiments testing the perception of and behaviors of individuals toward feminists and environmentalists. "By aggressively promoting change and advocating unconventional practices, activists become associated with hostile militancy and unconventionality or eccentricity."

One of the University of Toronto experiments asked 228 Americans to describe "typical feminists" and "typical environmentalists." The most commonly mentioned traits were "man-hating" and "unhygienic" for the former and "tree-hugger" and "hippie" for the latter. Ouch.

In another experiment, 140 Americans were asked to read an article advocating for climate change and sustainable lifestyles. One-third of participants were told it was written by a stereotypically extreme environmentalist (a fake author profile said, "I hold rallies outside chemical plants"); one-third were told it was written by a more moderate environmentalist (this profile said the author "raises money for grass-roots level environmental organizations); the final third were given an author profile that made no mention of environmental activism.

Unsurprisingly, the researchers found people were "much less motivated to adopt pro-environmental behaviors" when they were told the author was a stereotypical environmentalist. To add insult to injury, "this dynamic may very well apply across the board, such as to activities advocating gay rights or Wall Street reform," writes Tom Jacobs at Pacific Standard.

It's a catch-22 for activists because the more involved and passionate they are for a cause, the less likely non-activists are to trust them or be moved by their arguments, say researchers:

This tendency to associate activists with negative stereotypes and perceive them as people with whom it would be unpleasant to affiliate reduces individuals' motivation to adopt the pro-change behaviors that activists advocate. [Pacific Standard]

But, there is a silver lining… sort of. The study notes that people "may be more receptive to advocates who defy stereotypes by coming across as pleasant and approachable."

You hear that, feminists and environmentalists? Be more pleasant! Be more approachable! And for goodness sake, take a shower and get your hands off that tree!

Recommended

Did Dry January accomplish anything?
Drinking glasses.
Picture of Harold MaassHarold Maass

Did Dry January accomplish anything?

6 amazing homes with domes
House
Feature

6 amazing homes with domes

The Check-In: 48 hours in San Diego, a long-awaited river cruise, and more
A surfer at Windansea Beach in La Jolla.
Feature

The Check-In: 48 hours in San Diego, a long-awaited river cruise, and more

The Week contest: AI pizza
Paris's first robotic pizzeria.
Feature

The Week contest: AI pizza

Most Popular

The Hogwarts Legacy boycott controversy, explained
Hogwarts Legacy logo photo
Briefing

The Hogwarts Legacy boycott controversy, explained

5 toons about egg prices
Editorial Cartoon
Feature

5 toons about egg prices

The Adani Group scandal, explained
Gautam Adani.
Briefing

The Adani Group scandal, explained