There are 3 unemployed workers for every job opening

Despite modest GDP growth, unemployment is still a huge problem in America, a report released Tuesday by the Bureau of Labor Statistics confirms.

Heidi Shierholz from the Economic Policy Institute crunched the numbers and created some pretty depressing charts. Here is the number of unemployed people compared to the number of job openings, per industry.

Yes, it's as bad as it looks. In April, the average "job-seekers ratio" was 3.1-to-1, which means there were more than three unemployed people for every available job. In construction, the ratio was 12-to-1.

The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

Join more than 350,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with a selection of The Week’s most interesting, enlightening and entertaining stories - plus daily puzzles.

Join more than 350,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with a selection of The Week’s most interesting, enlightening and entertaining stories - plus daily puzzles.

Sign up

Shierholz said the numbers prove that "the main problem in the labor market is a broad-based lack of demand for workers — and not, as is often claimed, available workers lacking the skills needed for the sectors with job openings."

The Atlantic's Jordan Weissman wonders if "companies used the recession as a chance to lay off employees whose talents were no longer valuable to them and have yet to find replacements with fresher skills."

Whatever the reason for the gap, the fact remains that, for job-seekers, the economy is still rough. Shierholz whipped up another chart showing the job-seekers ratio for the last 13 years.

Note that the current ratio — while a vast improvement over July 2009's high of 6.7-to-1 — is still worse than the aftermath of the last recession, which followed the bursting of the dot-com bubble.

What's the problem? While layoffs have held steady, hiring hasn't increased enough to compensate for previous losses, meaning, according to Shierholz, "the consequences for workers of being laid off are far worse now than before the recession began; workers are far less likely to find a new job within a reasonable timeframe, particularly one that pays as much as the job they lost."