Turkey: A mysterious attack on the U.S. Embassy
Who was really behind last week’s attack on the U.S. Embassy in Turkey?
Who was really behind last week’s attack on the U.S. Embassy in Turkey? asked Murat Yetkin in Hurriyet (Turkey). We know who the suicide bomber was: Ecevit Sanli, who blew himself up at the visitors’ gate, killing a Turkish security guard and wounding a Turkish reporter who was waiting to interview U.S. Ambassador Francis Ricciardone. Sanli was a member of the leftist militant group Revolutionary People’s Liberation Party-Front (DHKP-C); he had been released from prison after suffering brain damage from a hunger strike. The DHKP-C claimed responsibility for the attack, citing America’s “imperialist ventures.” But it seems bizarre and implausible that the radical leftists would strike against the U.S. now, decades after their Cold War heyday. We know the group had links to Syria in the past. Could Syria be involved?
The Syrian conflict is surely the cause of the attack, said the Daily Times (Pakistan). The DHKP-C posted a message to President Obama on its website saying, “It is the Syrian people who will decide how, and by whom, Syria will be governed,” and adding “Get your bases, your missiles, and your Patriots the hell out of our country.” That’s a reference to the deployment in December of U.S. Patriot missiles to Turkey, where they are manned by U.S. troops. The U.S. sent the missiles to aid its NATO ally after a number of skirmishes on the Turkish-Syrian border. But both Turkey and the U.S. would do better to stay out of the conflict. “The U.S.-led West should restrain its ambitions to mold Syria along the lines of Libya and desist from such interventions in a highly volatile area with the potential to threaten regional and world peace.”
The attack is blowback from Syria, all right—but not by leftist radicals, said Alireza Zakhah in Khorasan News (Iran). “Ottoman Marxists don’t commit suicide bombings.” No, this attack was obviously the work of al Qaida. For the past two years, Turkey has encouraged al Qaida militancy in Syria, because it is trying by any and all means to overthrow the legitimate Syrian government. As a result, there is now a “pronounced presence of Turkish nationals” in the jihadist group. But al Qaida has turned on Turkey, and is using the Marxists as a front to attack on its territory.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Somebody certainly used the DHKP-C, said Beril Dedeoglu in Today’s Zaman (Turkey). The leftist group is “a complicated player” that often performs subcontract work for other militant organizations. It has even been suggested that it “is an instrument used by the deep state,” the shadowy network of Turkish military and political elites that many believe really control events in Turkey. This latest attack may confirm that suspicion. Ask yourself: Who benefits from a low-casualty attack on the U.S. Embassy here, which effectively targets both Turkey and the U.S.? Such an attack can only be expected “to bring these two countries closer, to confirm their alliance, and to expand their common strategic operations” in Syria. No terrorist group really wants that. But Turkey’s deep state does.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
5 timely cartoons about climate change denial
Cartoons Artists take on textbook trouble, bizarre beliefs, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Kris Kristofferson: the free-spirited country music star who studied at Oxford
In the Spotlight The songwriter, singer and film-star has died aged 88
By The Week UK Published
-
The Chagos agreement explained
In Depth Ceding the islands to Mauritius could allow China to gain foothold in the Indo-Pacific, experts have warned
By The Week UK Published
-
Malaysia: Hiding something or just incompetent?
feature It is “painful to watch” how Malaysia has embarrassed itself before the world with its bungled response to the missing plane.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Tunisia: The only bloom of the Arab Spring
feature After years of “stormy discussions and intellectual tug-of-war,” Tunisia has emerged as a secular democracy.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Australia: It takes two to reconcile
feature To move beyond Australia’s colonialist past, we Aborigines must forgive.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Israel: Ariel Sharon’s ambiguous legacy
feature Ariel Sharon played a key role at every major crossroads Israel faced in his adult life.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
South Africa: Trying to live up to Mandela
feature That South Africa was prepared for the death of Nelson Mandela is one of his greatest legacies.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
China: Staking a claim to the air and the sea
feature China has declared an air defense identification zone over the East China Sea that includes a set of islands claimed by Japan.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
China: Is our aid to the Philippines too meager?
feature China donated $100,000 to the Philippines after Typhoon Haiyan, but later increased the amount to $1.6 million.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Philippines: A calamitous response to calamity
feature “Where is the food, where is the water? Where are the military collecting the dead?”
By The Week Staff Last updated