“It’s time to talk about guns,” said Nicholas Thompson in NewYorker.com, “but it’s also time to talk about a lot more.” After last week’s unimaginable massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., where 20-year-old Adam Lanza shot dead 20 children, Americans must recognize that such violence isn’t the product of weak gun laws. “It’s much deeper than that.” It’s time to look hard at “America’s culture of violence,” including movies, music, and video games. The super-realistic shootings and explosions and fetishistic acts of vengeance that fill popular culture feed the fantasies of troubled loners, and even make blowing people away look like fun. Some of these video games look “just like police and military simulators” I’ve used, said former Army Ranger and police trainer Dave Grossman in Patch.com. Kids who amass points by mowing down waves of attackers learn the same kinds of “conditioned responses, killing skills, and desensitization” we teach to soldiers. If kids playing these games are emotionally disturbed, they can readily take these lessons into the real world, making battlefields of schools and malls.
Video games may feed violent fantasies, said David Kopel in The Wall Street Journal, but so do the news media. Part of what drives many of these atrocities is “the instant celebrity that a mass killer can achieve.” The media frenzy that follows every one of these attacks is not lost on troubled loners, who crave recognition of their suffering and a powerful expression of their rage. By going on a killing spree, they know, they will become famous anti-heroes, with their names and faces immortalized on every TV news program, newspaper, and website. If we want the massacres to stop, said Tim Berry in BusinessInsider.com, then all media outlets should simply agree to “not publish killers’ names or pictures,” the way they don’t publish those of rape victims.
There’s a more complex problem at the root of this, said Liza Long in HuffingtonPost.com, and it’s mental illness. I’m the mother of a brilliant 13-year-old boy who, much like Adam Lanza, cannot relate to people, and suffers inexplicable attacks of sudden, violent rage. He’s seen counselors and psychiatrists and takes “a slew of antipsychotic and mood-altering pharmaceuticals,” all to no avail. “This problem is too big for me to handle on my own,” yet the only options open to parents like me are to ask authorities to put our kids in jail or lock them up in a mental institution. “We don’t know yet if Adam Lanza was mentally ill, or whether a better system would have helped him,” said Rich Lowry in NationalReview.com. But Jared Loughner, who went on a shooting spree in Tucson, and James Holmes, who perpetrated the massacre in Aurora, Colo., clearly were schizophrenic. We need more psychiatric beds, and a better legal mechanism to compel people with serious mental illnesses to get treatment.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
No single solution will suffice, said Andrew O’Hehir in Salon.com. Horrors like Sandy Hook are the product of “a toxic stew of legal, cultural, and psychological forces,” and if we’re to prevent future shootings, we need to address all of them. “Ultimate safety” is beyond our reach, said Michael Gerson in The Washington Post. But “this does not mean we are helpless.” The process of preventing another Sandy Hook begins with us finding our resolve. Whatever practical measures we take in the coming months, “the first, necessary response to the unacceptable is not to accept it.”
Continue reading for free
We hope you're enjoying The Week's refreshingly open-minded journalism.
Subscribed to The Week? Register your account with the same email as your subscription.