Norway: Not insane, but fully culpable
Finding Anders Behring Breivik sane was “a good and right decision.”
Hanne Skartveit
Verdens Gang
Finding Anders Behring Breivik sane was “a good and right decision,” said Hanne Skartveit. The court ruled last week that the far-right terrorist knew right from wrong last year when he coldly gunned down 69 young leftist party activists on the island of Utoya and blew up eight people in Oslo. The verdict, which came with a maximum sentence of 21 years in prison, is a relief for those survivors and family members who feared the courts would “mistake evil for illness.” The first two forensic psychiatrists who examined Breivik diagnosed him as a paranoid schizophrenic—but no other doctor who saw him believed that he “is or ever was psychotic.” The slaughter of those innocents was perpetrated “by a sane man with a diseased worldview.” That makes him fully culpable. While some unfamiliar with Norwegian justice may find the sentence too lenient, we are confident that Breivik will never be released. Even after his prison term is up, he won’t be freed if he is deemed a danger to anyone. And he’s already said he won’t appeal, so this ruling “puts a final end to the criminal case”—and an end to Norway’s exposure to this hateful man. It affirms Norwegian justice’s fundamental principle that redemption is possible, but also that “it is morally right that the one who does evil should be held accountable for it.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Will California's EV mandate survive Trump, SCOTUS challenge?
Today's Big Question The Golden State's climate goal faces big obstacles
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
'Underneath the noise, however, there’s an existential crisis'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
2024: the year of distrust in science
In the Spotlight Science and politics do not seem to mix
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Ukraine: Fascist coup or Russian invasion?
feature Crimean voters will confirm the decision to rejoin Russia in a referendum scheduled for March 16.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Ukraine: Only Germany can deal with Russia
feature Vladimir Putin is betting that the West will simply squawk a bit and then calm down. Will he win the bet?
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Ukraine: Torn between Europe and Russia
feature Ukraine’s revolution may not be over— many in Crimea are waving Russian flags and refusing to recognize the provisional government in Kiev.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Ukraine: Will Europe intervene?
feature The masses of protesters are no longer confined to Kiev—they’re all over the country.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Ukraine: A pro-Europe people with pro-Russia leaders
feature Hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians are united in fury against President Viktor Yanukovych.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Ukraine: Yanked back toward Mother Russia
feature Ukraine is once again torn between its pro-European and pro-Russian halves.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Europe: Is it time to bomb Syria?
feature The West has so far been governed by those who say the Syrian conflict is too complex and messy to get involved in.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Turkey: Was the military really planning a coup?
feature The charges against the military were so outrageous as to be hard to believe.
By The Week Staff Last updated