Donor disclosure law thwarted
Senate Republicans blocked a bill that would require outside political groups to disclose information on donors who give more than $10,000.
Senate Republicans this week blocked a bill that would require outside political groups to disclose the names and contributions of campaign donors who give more than $10,000. Two separate votes on the DISCLOSE Act received unanimous support from majority Democrats, but failed to muster the 60 votes necessary to head off a Republican filibuster. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who has argued for full disclosure of donations in the past, called the DISCLOSE Act “un-American” and “an attempt to identify and punish political enemies, or at the very least, intimidate others from participating in the process.”
With this bill, Democrats are out to “silence their opponents,” said Bradley A. Smith in NationalReview.com. Forcing the disclosure of donor lists would allow the Obama campaign and its supporters to “harass and publicly vilify” anyone who disagreed with their agenda; spending by pro-Democratic labor unions, meanwhile, would remain largely unreported. This is all about Obama losing the money war, said Peter Roff in USNews.com. Only now that Mitt Romney is “raking in the cash” have campaign contributions suddenly become a problem. Democrats “don’t want fairness.” They just want “the GOP’s money out of the political process.”
Republicans were for transparency before they were against it, said Bloomberg.com in an editorial. For years, GOP lawmakers called for disclosure rules, but they’ve conveniently changed their minds since the Citizens United ruling allowed their corporate backers to spend with abandon. In fact, said John Avlon in TheDailyBeast.com, the Supreme Court’s controversial 2010 decision promised to “balance unlimited money with unprecedented transparency.” Instead, we’re getting all the hidden cash with none of the sunlight.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Enough already with protecting fat cats, said The Washington Post. Don’t Republicans see that it is “corrosive for democracy” for writers of $10 million campaign checks—and their motives—to remain hidden? Politicians need to curb “their lust for contributions” and salvage their credibility. We need greater disclosure now, before we find ourselves “haunted by the secret money of the 2012 campaign.”
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Why more and more adults are reaching for soft toys
Under The Radar Does the popularity of the Squishmallow show Gen Z are 'scared to grow up'?
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Magazine solutions - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
Puzzles and Quizzes Issue - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
By The Week US Published
-
Magazine printables - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
Puzzles and Quizzes Issue - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
By The Week US Published
-
NSA surveillance ruled unconstitutional
feature A federal judge ruled that the National Security Agency's mass collection of domestic phone data “almost certainly” violates the Constitution.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
The gun debate one year after Newtown
feature The first anniversary of the school shootings in Newtown reignited the debate over gun control, as another school shooting occurred in Colorado.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
A gun revolt in Colorado
feature Two Colorado Democrats who helped push through tough new gun-control laws were ousted in a historic recall vote.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
The battle over voter ID laws
feature The Obama administration is challenging the right of Texas to enforce rigorous new voting restrictions.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Stricter affirmative action
feature The Supreme Court raised the bar for considering race in university admissions.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Voting Rights Act gutted
feature The Supreme Court struck down a core component of the 1965 Voting Rights Act.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
A turning point on gay marriage
feature The Supreme Court struck a historic blow in favor of gay rights.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Court approves DNA swabs
feature The Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4 decision that police are justified in taking DNA samples from anyone who’s arrested.
By The Week Staff Last updated