Feature

Court upholds Citizens United

The Supreme Court ruled that Montana’s century-old restriction on political spending by corporations cannot stand.

The Supreme Court reaffirmed its controversial Citizens United decision this week, ruling 5–4 that Montana’s century-old restriction on political spending by corporations cannot stand. The Montana Supreme Court had maintained that the state’s history of rampant political corruption by mining companies justified the law. But a majority of justices disagreed, saying “there can be no serious doubt” that the state had to conform to the Supreme Court’s 2010 decision allowing corporations and unions to spend unlimited sums to support or oppose political candidates. 

The Supreme Court has just “piled cowardice atop confusion,” said Bloomberg.com in an editorial. It is simply “not possible to credibly argue, as the Citizens United opinion does, that huge corporate expenditures to aid select political candidates do not give rise to corruption.” But the court’s majority “slinked away” from that reality. With Republicans blocking legislation requiring more disclosure on campaign contributions, powerful interests remain free not only to “influence elections, but to do so secretly.”

Montana gave the Supreme Court no choice, said Bradley Smith in NationalReview.com. The state held that it is “so uniquely corrupt” that it can ignore free speech. That’s like a state arguing that its crime rates are so bad that police can conduct unreasonable searches without a warrant. “The argument is absurd on its face.” And while there’s more money in politics now, “that’s a good thing,” because it “increases voter knowledge and interest.”

If you want to see the “perfect illustration of the squalid state of political money,” just look at casino magnate Sheldon Adelson, said The New York Times. He has already pledged at least $60 million to defeating President Obama. His checks may even buy his way out of a federal corruption investigation, which he “undoubtedly hopes will go away in a Romney administration.” As long as we have “no legal or moral limits to the purchase of influence,” the super-rich will buy politicians the same way they buy fancy cars and oceanfront mansions. 

Recommended

Amsterdam launches campaign urging rowdy British men to 'stay away'
Amsterdam Red Light District
causing a nuisance

Amsterdam launches campaign urging rowdy British men to 'stay away'

Is the U.S. running out of ammunition?
Cargo of ammunition, weapons and other equipment bound for Ukraine waiting on a tarmac at Dover Air Force Base in Dover, Delaware
Today's big question

Is the U.S. running out of ammunition?

France aspires to work by working less. Is it working?
Paris city center
In depth

France aspires to work by working less. Is it working?

Ukraine's looming counteroffensive
Ukraine counteroffensive
In depth

Ukraine's looming counteroffensive

Most Popular

How to watch 5 planets align in the night sky on Tuesday
Moon, Jupiter, Venus.
skyline

How to watch 5 planets align in the night sky on Tuesday

'Rewilding' animals could help combat climate change, study finds
Two gray wolves.
where the wild things are

'Rewilding' animals could help combat climate change, study finds

Harry Potter star Daniel Radcliffe is going to be a dad
Erin Darke and Daniel Radcliffe
harry potter and the dadly hallows

Harry Potter star Daniel Radcliffe is going to be a dad