Exhibit of the week: Ecstatic Alphabets/Heaps of Language

Not many art exhibitions invite the public to participate by phone.

Museum of Modern Art, New York

Through Aug. 27

The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

Don’t brush past the hallway too quickly, said Andrew Russeth in GalleristNY.com. Better to think of the show as split in two, beginning with that entry corridor’s “absorbing assortment of linguistics-tinged art-historical treats.” As visitors take in visual works by Marcel Duchamp, Kurt Schwitters, Jasper Johns, and others, they hear poetry being recited and stroll on a black-and-white runner, created by German artist Ferdinand Kriwet in 1969, that’s emblazoned with the words “Walk Talk Walk Talk.” So far, so wonderful. But the contemporary work is less consistently enchanting. Sharon Hayes offers “a typically ponderous” printed text about protest, while Adam Pendleton’s monochrome letter paintings look like “icy 1970s conceptual art enlarged for no particular reason.” Easily “the most thrilling contemporary entries” are those in which the artists have evoked the first half of the exhibition’s title, “teasing ecstatic experience out of their limited materials.” Ei Arakawa and Nikolas Gambaroff used spray paint to create 325 colorful flags, each bearing a two-letter monogram, that are scattered about from ceiling to floor. They’re the embodiment of language run “deliriously amok.”

More such playfulness would have been welcome, said Kyle Chayka in ArtInfo.com. The final galleries are for the most part “spare and clean, anchored by large-scale works that look good in large blank spaces.” But missing is the sense of intimacy that the 20th-century artists created, the instinctive celebration of language’s capacity to promote human connection. “In the end, there is a kind of poetry to the show’s two juxtaposed parts. Where the modernists put great store in the ability of language to connect people, our contemporaries seem more content to let it fail.”